Search for: "In re Admin. Order No. 19"
Results 1 - 20
of 111
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
But the bottom line is this: you’re likely to experience better outcomes with cooperation than without it. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am
On 21 May 2024, judgment was handed down in R (On the application of National Council for Civil Liberties) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2024] EWHC 1181 (Admin). [read post]
19 May 2024, 12:25 am
: on R (TTT) v Michaela Community Schools Trust [2024] EWHC 843 (Admin). [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In the end, it paid a $19 million civil penalty to settle those claims. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Whether you’re here in person or participating virtually from around the country, or even overseas, I thank you for joining us. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
General Motors Corp., 141 F.3d 714, 720 (7th Cir. 1998) (disallowing opinion of expert witness, who “lacked any scientific basis for an opinion about … motives,” about defendant’s failure to add safety measure in order to “save money”); In re Diet Drugs Prods. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
At the minimum, a re-proposal could have resulted in a better estimate of the costs and benefits associated with this rulemaking. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
Release No. 11226, In re Impact Theory LLC, Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings (Aug. 28, 2023), https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/admin/2023/33-11226.pdf; Elizabeth Napolitano, SEC Issues First Enforcement Action Targeting NFTs, CoinDesk (Aug. 28, 2023), https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2023/08/28/sec-issues-first-enforcement-action-targeting-nfts/. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Supreme Court to Decide if Biden Admin Illegally Bullied Social Media into Censoring Content Yahoo News – Kyle Cheney and Rebecca Kern (Politico) | Published: 10/20/2023 The Supreme Court will determine whether the Biden administration violated the Constitution when it pressured technology companies to remove from their platforms what federal officials said was false or misleading content about the 2020 election and Covid-19. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
”[14] The Ninth Circuit noted that there is no such language under Section 10(b) or Rule 10b-5, which instead address omissions that are “necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 1:28 pm
In Re Ethereummax Investor Litig., No. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Lawmaker Hid One Key Fact as He Fought Checks on Gun Shops DNyuz – Glen Thrush (New York Times) | Published: 8/25/2023 Rep. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
The bottom of the page—the bibliography section—still lists everything in a loosely chronological order. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:41 pm
But the point I think I’ve tried to make to you is that we’re very confident that the arrangements that we’ve put in place with Rwanda are in accordance with our international law obligations”. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 3:44 am
And law firms may finally move towards flat rate billing models in order to meet client expectations around efficiency gains from AI. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 4:31 pm
They have to have second-order justifications. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 4:33 am
Christian Lang 5:19 Sure. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:30 pm
., the consumer welfare standard in antitrust law, executive orders mandating cost-benefit analysis of proposed regulations). [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
Finally, courtesy of the Tenth Circuit, an admin-law decision with some real fireworks in it. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
He was also ordered to pay $355,535.10 in restitution. [read post]
