Search for: "In re Brandi B." Results 1 - 20 of 45
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2023, 9:03 pm by Claire Hill
Attorney General Merrick B. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 4:03 am
In fact, I wonder whether making more decisions precedential would only confuse things.Section 2(a) - False suggestion of a connectionPrecedential No. 24: "PURPLE RAIN" for Dietary Supplements Falsely Suggests a Connection with Prince, Says TTAB Section 2(b) - Governmental Insignia: Precedential No. 19: TTAB Affirms Section 2(b) Refusals of Orange County "Unofficial" Insignia Section 2(c) - Consent of living individualPrecedential No. 36: TTAB Sustains… [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 5:06 am
ADOL Sh.p.k., Oppositions Nos. 91234244 and 91234345 [Oppositions to registration of SKËNDERBEU and GJERGJ KASTRIOTI SKËNDERBEU (Stylized) for "Beverages from wine distillates, namely, brandy and grape brandy" on the grounds of fraud and likelihood of confusion with the previously used mark GJERGJ KASTRIOTI SKËNDERBEU for liquor, including brandy.] [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
Rather, courts may find that the letter of intent is not a contract and yet still obligates the parties to negotiate in good faith.[13] Also, courts may may go beyond the language of the letter of intent to examine factors such as the context of negotiations and customary practices.[14] B. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 3:00 am by Jack Sharman
It was one of the first R&B/soul songs I recall hearing everywhere — car radio, record store — just everywhere. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Richard Re has this blog’s argument analysis. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 8:44 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Here's the lede to the Dallas News article breaking the story:Unused basketball courts at the Lyle B. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 6:23 pm by Stephen Page
If you're not a family lawyer, I suggest that you let Federal Attorney-General Senator George Brandis know your views. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 5:04 am by Gritsforbreakfast
It'd be interesting to see a comparison of the post-'07 reforms and the details of this case to see where changes either a) helped identify and remove the wrongdoer or b) failed to prevent his alleged misconduct as was hoped. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
Thus, recipes are functional directions for achieving a result and are excluded from copyright protection under 17 U.S.C. 102(b)" adding for good measure "Certainly plaintiffs cannot be suggesting that somehow the copyright prevents defendants from serving chicken salad sandwiches". [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
So, blocking orders: fine so long as they're reasonable! [read post]