Search for: "In re C. D. H. (1970)"
Results 1 - 20
of 95
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
Scotland, Northern Ireland), but is rather subject to re-examination by the competent court (e.g. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:52 am
[23] See, e.g., Water Res. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Trump, supra, 928 F. 3d at 236, focusing on whether the social media site functions as a “tool of governance” “swathe[d] in the trappings of [the official’s] office,” see, Davison v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
The Supreme Court articulated the meaning of materiality in cases in the 1970s and 1980s.[6] It is this standard of materiality that is reflected in Commission rules.[7] It is this same materiality standard that appears in numerous disclosure rules governing registration statements and public company annual reports.[8] It is this same materiality standard that is used throughout the final rules we’re considering today. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Harold H. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 8:12 am
Together they describe the epistēmē (understood as "the strategic apparatus which permits of separating out from among all the statements which are possible those that will be acceptable" Foucault, Power/Knowledge (C. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Session 3: Federalism John C. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Here is what the cited article, footnote 40 in “Vermin of Proof,” says: “RESULTS: The temporal trends in prevalence rates for specific birth defects examined from 1970 through 1992 did not show changes that reflected the cessation of Bendectin use over the 1980–84 period. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
That’s why we’re updating our rules for the technology and business models of the 2020s. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 7:16 pm
But it has been the invigoration of a more muscular federalism, with what appears to be a willingness by the US Supreme Court to re-imagine the division of authority between states and the national government, that is now providing substantial impetus for a vigorous debate about ESG beyond the conversations traditionally driven by elites in apex public and private institutions. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
One of Selikoff’s great achievements, the federalization of worker safety and health in the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970,[3] languishes because of inadequate resources for enforcement and frivolous efforts to address non-existent problems, such as the lowering of the crystalline silica permissible exposure limit. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 11:57 am
Depravation does not rely on the Crown proving who the rightful owner of the motor vehicle is, only that the Crown proves that the accused in fact, did not have a possessory right or proprietary interest in the motor vehicle (see: O’Keefe v R, 2007 NLCA 58 (CanLII); and Regina v McDowell, 1970 CanLII 1072 (ONCA)). [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
In In re Dolly Varden Chocolate Co., decided in 1924, the Court reiterated that “the words ‘Merrie Christmas’ [do] not to constitute a valid technical trade-mark for ribbon. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 7:22 pm
The graphic below summarizes the results: Source: William D. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
In “Cheng’s Proposed Consensus Rule for Expert Witnesses,”[1] I discussed a recent law review article by Professor Edward K. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:44 pm
In the 1970s, then-Chief Judge David L. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Vicki C. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am
Scharf, George D. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
Trust and Estate Implications Involving Potentially Incapacitated PersonsS.T. v. 1515 Broad Street, LLC (A-87-18) (081916) Argued November 6, 2019 -- Decided March 9, 2020ALBIN, J., writing for the Court.Only when, through proper legal procedures, a court determines that a litigant lacks the mental capacity to govern her affairs may the litigant be deprived of the right to decide the destiny of her lawsuit. [read post]
