Search for: "In re D.S." Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2021, 7:28 am by John Rubin
In re D.S., 364 N.C. 184, 193–94 (2010) (holding that noncompliance with 15-day deadline, plus 15-day extension, for filing of juvenile delinquency petition following submission of complaint did not deprive court of jurisdiction; court relies on decisions holding that a statute’s use of term “shall” for time in which to act may be directory, not mandatory). [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Intitulé : D.S. c. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 12:21 am by Orin S. Kerr
State Katelin Seo was arrested for harassing and stalking a man we know only as "D.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 2:56 pm by Andrew Crocker
” We’re gratified by the ruling, and we’re watching for courts in New Jersey, Oregon and elsewhere to continue the trend of protecting against compelled decryption. [read post]
8 May 2020, 10:00 am by Don Cruse
DETRICK AND CAROLYN DART DETRICK, No. 19-0117 Opinion of the Court IN RE PRAVEEN PANCHAKARLA, No. 19-0585 Per Curiam [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 2:22 pm
Aunt assumed care for D.S., but reported to the Agency that she could not currently care for D.S. due to her own health issues. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:30 am by Daily Record Staff
D.S. noted an appeal, in which ... [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 7:52 am by MBettman
In re D.S., 2016-Ohio-1027 (It is not a due process violation to impose upon a juvenile registration and notification requirements that extend beyond the age of 18 or 21.) [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:18 am by William Ford
” Discussants will include Kiron Skinner, the director of the office of policy planning and the senior policy advisor to the secretary of state; Mary Elizabeth Taylor, the assistant secretary of state for legislative affairs; and Yleem D.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:06 am by MBettman
In re D.S., 2016-Ohio-1027 (It is not a due process violation to impose upon juvenile registration and notification requirements that extend beyond the age of 18 or 21.) [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 7:35 am by MBettman
In re D.S., 2016-Ohio-1027 (It is not a due process violation to impose upon juvenile registration and notification requirements that extend beyond the age of 18 or 21.) [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 9:39 am by José Guillermo
El Gobierno mediante DS Nº 086-2018 ha fijado la UNIDAD DE INGRESO  DEL SECTOR PÚBLICO Comparto con ustedes la Ley y todas las disposiciones que el decreto supremo consigna como fundamento de la decisión que contiene. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 7:08 am by MBettman
”) In re D.S., 2016-Ohio-7369 (Kennedy, J., concurring in the judgment) (In a prior juvenile case involving a juvenile’s admission of guilt, Justice Kennedy applied criminal plain-error to a mutual mistake of law, which caused a “manifest injustice,” without considering whether this error was outcome determinative.) [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:59 pm by jameswilson29@gmail.com
See In re Mac Donald, 755 F.2d at 717 (9th Cir. 1985); In re Holtkamp, 669 F.2d 505, 508-09 (7th Cir.1982); In re Revco D.S., Inc., 99 B.R. 768, 776-77 (N.D.Ohio 1989); In re Pro Football Weekly, Inc., 60 B.R. 824, 826-27 (N.D.Ill.1986); Broadhurst v. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 7:09 am by Andrew Delaney
In re D.S., 2016 VT 130By Elizabeth Kruska It’s not often the Vermont Supreme Court reverses a termination of parental rights (TPR) decision. [read post]