Search for: "In re Dennis H."
Results 1 - 20
of 147
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2024, 7:11 pm
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit’s 2023 decision in In re Cellect, LLC, 81 F.4th 1216 (Fed. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
Most workers usually don’t know what they’re getting involved in. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
The Supreme Court articulated the meaning of materiality in cases in the 1970s and 1980s.[6] It is this standard of materiality that is reflected in Commission rules.[7] It is this same materiality standard that appears in numerous disclosure rules governing registration statements and public company annual reports.[8] It is this same materiality standard that is used throughout the final rules we’re considering today. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 9:03 am
In the first case, In re Honeywell Int’l Inc., Honeywell was sued for patent infringement in the Western District of Texas. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:59 pm
Most notably, Amgen does not mention In re Wands, 858 F.2d 731 (Fed. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Joiner had can cause small-cell lung cancer.[13] Perhaps the most egregious lapses in scholarship occur when Ranges, a newly minted scientist, and her co-author, a full professor of law, write: “For example, Bendectin, an antinausea medication prescribed to pregnant women, caused a slew of birth defects (hence its nickname ‘The Second Thalidomide’).49”[14] I had to re-read this sentence many times to make sure I was not hallucinating. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 11:32 am
See 4(h)(1)(A) referring to 4(e)(1). [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:43 am
In a recent post, Dennis pointed out that in H. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
RE/MAX raised $220 million in October 2013. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 10:24 am
Theodore H. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
This repository contains a collection of information for researchers, journalists, educators, scholars, and the public at large. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Logan H. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
That is, the time required for the Georgia trial “shall be excluded in computing the time” under the federal Speedy Trial Act. 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(1)(B) (excluding “delay resulting from trial with respect to other charges against the defendant”). [read post]
10 May 2023, 12:35 pm
Corporate Law The Corporation as Technology: Re-calibrating Corporate Governance for A Sustainable Future / Bruner, Christopher M. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 2:20 am
30-34 Choi, Sung-Soo “Review of the several issues of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments”, Gachon Law Review 14 (2021), pp. 37-68 (available here) Clavel, Sandrine ; Jault-Seseke, Fabienne “La convention de La Haye du 2 juillet 2019 sur la reconnaissance et l’exécution des jugements étrangers en matière civile ou commerciale : Que peut-on en attendre ? [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 12:49 am
30-34 Choi, Sung-Soo “Review of the several issues of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments”, Gachon Law Review 14 (2021), pp. 37-68 (available here) Clavel, Sandrine ; Jault-Seseke, Fabienne “La convention de La Haye du 2 juillet 2019 sur la reconnaissance et l’exécution des jugements étrangers en matière civile ou commerciale : Que peut-on en attendre ? [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 1:44 am
Dennis. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
See note 9, infra (discussing such comments in In re Franklin National Bank Securities Litigation and Bank of Dearborn v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 11:51 pm
30-34 Choi, Sung-Soo “Review of the several issues of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments”, Gachon Law Review 14 (2021), pp. 37-68 (available here) Clavel, Sandrine ; Jault-Seseke, Fabienne “La convention de La Haye du 2 juillet 2019 sur la reconnaissance et l’exécution des jugements étrangers en matière civile ou commerciale : Que peut-on en attendre ? [read post]
