Search for: "In re Doe, b. 10/27/97."
Results 1 - 20
of 117
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 7:15 am
Electrodiagnostic Studies—Upper Extremities—Applicant, 35 years old, suffered an industrial injury on 10/27/2017. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
From today's Fourth Circuit opinion in Doe v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
From today's Fourth Circuit opinion in Doe v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Dombalagian (who did not participate in In re Apple Securities Litigation), the John B. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am
A Chancellor usually also wants to know what steps will be taken to avoid further such illegality taking place in the future. [97]. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
From today's Fourth Circuit opinion in Doe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
From today's Fourth Circuit opinion in Doe v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:27 pm
" Notwithstanding requests to administrators, no action was taken. 97. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 1:58 pm
That does not matter now, however. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
”[10] The precise threshold for “excluding the possibility” is unclear, but some courts have said it does not require “definitive” exclusion, and that the defendant’s theory of the case should be credited,[11] though not accepted as truth when factual discrepancies are clear. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am
Jacobson, 6 F.3d 233, 238 (4th Cir. 1993); In re Sealed Case, 931 F.3d 92, 97 (D.C. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
While shareholder proposals that limit management entrenchment can add value to a company,[27] others may not. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Regardless of how many cases are cited (and there are many possible “precedents”), the true parameter does not have a 95% probability of lying within the interval given by a given 95% confidence interval.[9] Similarly, as much as judges would like p-values and confidence intervals to eliminate the need to worry about systematic error, their saying so cannot make it so.[10] Even a mighty federal judge cannot make the p-value probability, or its complement, substitute for… [read post]
30 May 2023, 10:53 am
We’re usually kind of yeah, let’s see, see what the market does kind of sit back and wait, what are you seeing? [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 11:35 am
Walter B. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
Proc. 10 at 17—18.) [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
See note 9, infra (discussing such comments in In re Franklin National Bank Securities Litigation and Bank of Dearborn v. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 10:44 am
What does that mean for tuition again? [read post]
