Search for: "In re Eric B." Results 1 - 20 of 710
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2024, 9:40 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Basically, the FTC alleged ongoing anticompetitive threats under the Sherman Act, in part, because that facilitated their use of Section 13(b) of the FTC Act to seek injunctive relief. [read post]
24 May 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
That site contained troves of materials seemingly intended for use by Vance’s campaign and other potential supporters, including polling data, B-roll camera footage, opposition research, and other strategy documents. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:17 am by Beatrice Yahia
” Vera Bergengruen and Eric Cortellessa report for TIME. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:15 pm by Mary Anne Peck
Due to these types of cases, Kahn said, “I’m pretty sure we’re going to see more of these types of laws relaxing or eliminating the severe or pervasive standard. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Eric Goldman SAD scheme and what it tells us: Efficacy/brittleness of our institutions—the real action is below the waterline, with implications for everything else we’re doing. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:55 am by Tom Joscelyn
Trump also personally added multiple incendiary lines, including this one: “We fight like Hell and if you don’t fight like Hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Eric Johnson: have they been successful in pushing others out of the market? [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Cox case is alarming b/c takedown notices were often so bogus that © claims got dismissed, but they’re still held liable for ignoring bogus notices. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Eric Johnson: my confusion is often intrabrand: which variety does my son want? [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 11:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
But it’s narrow protection b/c there are no choices. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 3:53 pm by David Kopel
With over 200 episodes, we're still not up to 1,000 BC. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Dorothy Lund (Professor of Law, Columbia Law School) will moderate the discussion, and panelists will include: Renata B. [read post]