Search for: "In re Estrada"
Results 1 - 20
of 125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2010, 2:50 pm
They're on the Internet. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 5:48 am
Estrada, supra. [read post]
20 May 2011, 8:46 am
Maybe they’re right. [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:42 am
We're not prepared for it, we're not trained for it, and we shouldn't be doing federal work. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:47 am
[Officer Estrada]: Let me finish. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 4:26 pm
After that initial tap, and before a re-up, Brockus gave information regarding a homicide: that interview wasn’t reported in the wiretap re-up at *3. [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:57 pm
Emérito Estrada-Rivera, 722 F.3d 50 In re Rivera, 494 B.R. 101 (BAP 1st Cir. 2013) Panel 2 – Key Mainland Decisions Additional Reference Materials Castleton Plaza, LP, 707 F.3d 821 (7th Cir. 2013) Wooley v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 5:06 am
Estrada, Defendant Rudy Estrada pled guilty to illegal re-entry after being deported subsequent to an aggravated felony conviction. [read post]
29 Sep 2004, 12:28 pm
Cordoza-Estrada, No. 03-2666 (1st Cir. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 10:17 am
In re: Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Products Marketing, Sales Practices & Liability Litig., 903 F.3d 278 (3d Cir. 2018)Plaintiff Estrada alleged that perineal use of Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder can lead to an increased risk of developing ovarian cancer. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 1:46 pm
District court judges -- since they're solo -- will not have "coalition" problems. [read post]
7 May 2023, 2:37 pm
In the Supreme Court of California, Miguel Angel Estrada, Petitioner, v.The Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, Respondent; The People, Real Party in Interest. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 10:22 am
More fun, of course, since it's (1) an actual trial, and (2) you're working with people instead of boxes. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:22 am
He argues that, under the Act, the theft he committed is now a misdemeanor and that, under the holding in In re Estrada (1965) 63 Cal.2d 740, 744–745 (Estrada), he is entitled to the benefit of that reduction. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 1:54 pm
(In re Estrada (1965) 63 Cal.2d 740, 48 Cal.Rptr. 172, 408 P.2d 948 (Estrada) applies to cases when a defendant is placed on probation with a suspended sentence that may be appealed if probation is revoked. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 11:11 am
Estrada as a panelist and Senior D.C. [read post]
31 May 2015, 5:11 pm
“Evolving” is a good description – since the 2008 Estrada-Espinozaen banc decision, the Ninth (with some welcome guidance from the Supremes in Descamps) has defined and redefined this particularly tricky offense. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:37 pm
Estrada (2d Cir. 2005). [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 12:39 pm
He filed a motion to vacate his sentence and remand for resentencing under In re Estrada (1965) 63 Cal.2d 740 (Estrada) based on amendments to Penal Code section 654 following the passage of Assembly Bill No. 518. [read post]
29 May 2022, 12:26 pm
Conley (2016) 63 Cal.4th 646, 656, (Conley), citing In re Estrada (1965) 63 Cal.2d 740, (Estrada).) [read post]
