Search for: "In re Google Play Consumer Antitrust Litigation"
Results 1 - 20
of 94
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
They’re not doing ordinary judging. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 1:02 pm
If you’re looking for highly experienced business litigation attorneys, talk to us at Lubin Austermuehle. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 8:35 am
Then Megan and I consider the tough new UK rules for establishing the age of online porn consumers. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 10:56 am
The largest antitrust case of the last quarter century has been playing out in federal district court in Washington D.C. since mid-September. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 8:29 pm
First, the notice of a tentative settlement (this post continues below the document): In Re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation: Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re Deadlines in Consumers' and States' Actions in Light of Tentative Settlement It is not surprising that the class-action lawyers would settle with Google: in the end they just want to get paid. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
First, policy, social merits, transformative value, and market economics will all play a role in the copyright infringement defense of fair use, in antitrust cases around AI and analogous advanced technologies, and/or in other doctrines at play in how we regulate AI inputs and outputs. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:30 pm
Before the merger, a consumer wanting to play a Call of Duty console game had to buy a PlayStation or an Xbox. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am
So, that is something that is likely to be thought in this litigation as it goes forward. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 10:47 am
The AAI and the economists seek to support of opinion evidence in antitrust litigation against Google, In re Google Play Store Antitrust Litig., No. 3:21-md-02981-JD (N.D. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 10:47 am
AAI and the economists seek to support opinion evidence in antitrust litigation against Google, In re Google Play Store Antitrust Litig., No. 3:21-md-02981-JD (N.D. [read post]
15 May 2023, 7:37 am
The EU ruling reflects pragmatism, a consumer focus, and an open mind. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:47 am
Well, now antitrust is rising from its slumber and we have work for it to do. [read post]
4 May 2023, 10:00 am
” First, it lowered the price of its popular Fortnite in-app purchases on all platforms except Apple’s (and the Google Play Store) and formed an advocacy group seeking to put PR pressure on Apple to change its ways. [read post]
1 May 2023, 6:38 am
Judge Donato’s scathing opinion in In re Google Play Consumer Antitrust Litigation represents yet another cautionary tale for attorneys certifying that a client has taken appropriate steps to preserve all pertinent electronic discovery without providing meaningful oversight. [read post]
1 May 2023, 6:38 am
Judge Donato’s scathing opinion in In re Google Play Consumer Antitrust Litigation represents yet another cautionary tale for attorneys certifying that a client has taken appropriate steps to preserve all pertinent electronic discovery without providing meaningful oversight. [read post]
1 May 2023, 6:38 am
Judge Donato’s scathing opinion in In re Google Play Consumer Antitrust Litigation represents yet another cautionary tale for attorneys certifying that a client has taken appropriate steps to preserve all pertinent electronic discovery without providing meaningful oversight. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:28 am
At the very end, if they were to have standing and to prove harm, there would be the question of whether they're entitled to an injunction. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:12 am
Coincidentally, today is the cutoff date for fact discovery in two disparate antitrust actions involving Activision Blizzard King (ABK): the FTC's adjudicative proceeding (in-house lawsuit) over ABK's acquisition by Microsoft, andthe In Re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation in the Northern District of California, where Epic Games and Match Group are pursuing a per se violation claim against Google based on its "Project… [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:29 am
Yesterday, Judge James Donato of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, who is presiding over multiple consolidated Google Play Store antitrust cases (brought by Epic Games, three dozen state AGs, Match Group, and class-action plaintiffs), entered his findings of fact and conclusions of law, ordering monetary sanctions first (recovery of attorneys' fees) and announcing that non-monetary sanctions will be determined a little later:In… [read post]
