Search for: "In re Interest of David M. et al."
Results 1 - 20
of 185
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
” In an email transmitting the memo, Chesebro writes that Troupis “requested” the memo and that the details included “may be worthwhile if this is a topic that might be of interest in multiple states. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
I’m excited to make this point because it’s one I haven’t made before in a professional setting. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Collins and David M. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 4:29 am
Quick links Anna Bond, Lexology: Professor’s ‘anti-Zionist’ beliefs were protected: on Dr David Miller v University of Bristol [2024] ET 1400780/2022: we noted the case here. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:21 am
Jonge et al. knew that the files we posted on SoundCloud contained copyright-protected works is entirely irrelevant. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
What they got instead was something of a discursive bricolage that sought to satisfy everyone, and in the process neither their any of them, or in the long run, their own institutional interests. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
Safeguards under the Investigatory Powers Act for journalistic material gathered in bulk by UK intelligence agencies will be re-examined in the High Court. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
Mark Zuckerberg, et al., C.A. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
If the optimization function in the AI system is taking the interest of the platform into consideration as well as the interest of the customer, this can lead to conflicts of interest. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am
The test in Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 6:00 am
They’re part of a nonprofit network that has raised a staggering $89M from small, usually conservative donors. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 1:43 pm
The case is Hachette Book Group et al. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 3:50 am
Baumeister et al., “Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life,” 8 J Positive Psych 505 (2013). [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
So I’m sure other US-based UGC services clear the 50M MAU threshold (Minecraft and Roblox are two likely examples). [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
Professor Mayo’s recent article explores the interesting concept of intellectual conflicts of interest arising from journal editors and association leaders who use their positions to advance their personal views. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Professor David Faigman and others have attempted to articulate the scientific basis (if any) for opinion testimony in health-effects litigation that a give person’s disease has been caused by an exposure or condition. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
’”[3] The Commission’s broad authority to regulate the proxy voting process, found in Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act, outlaws proxy solicitations in contravention of such “regulations as the Commission may prescribe as necessary or appropriate in the public interest and for the protection of investors. [read post]
