Search for: "In re John R. (1979)" Results 1 - 20 of 150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Investment Company Act of 1940 There is a saying when you’re in the woods. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:02 am by Schwartzapfel Lawyers P.C.
Check it out if you’re a fan of Southern Gothic aesthetics and deep character drama. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
Irving John Selikoff registered for the draft, in Port Chester, New York. 1941. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
Scott Perry (R-Penn.) is protected by the Speech or Debate Clause from the Jan. 6 criminal investigation. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am by Andy Wright
Louie Gohmert (R-Tex.) who was trying to stop the electoral count on Jan. 6. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am by Bernard Bell
  In that context, protective orders can be used to limit the dissemination of materials that will not ultimately prove admissible at trial, Fed R. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm by admin
In “Cheng’s Proposed Consensus Rule for Expert Witnesses,”[1] I discussed a recent law review article by Professor Edward K. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
It can also be understood as shared perceptions of the meaning of reality backed by massive background consensus (Jürgen Habermas, Between Facts and Norms (William Rehg (trans) MIT Press, 1996); pp. 22, 322); or as biopolitics (the narratives through which social and political power may be normalized over the control and management of the bodies of the living and their relationship to physical and abstract objects and the technologies of control) (Michel Foucault, The Birth of Biopolitics:… [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
Wynne & Jaffe, 599 F. 2d 707, 712–13 (5th Cir. 1979); Mateer v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am by Eugene Volokh
Whether the exclusionary policy rests on the alleged undesirable propensities of those of a particular race, nationality, occupation, political affiliation, or age, in this context the Unruh Act protects individuals from such arbitrary discrimination.[14] An earlier decision likewise stated that, under the Unruh Act, a shopping center couldn't exclude prospective customers "who wear long hair or unconventional dress, who are black, who are members of the John Birch Society, or who… [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
First Circuit: Yeah, we're not touching the substance of this, as the plaintiffs all lack standing. [read post]