Search for: "In re John V. (1992)" Results 1 - 20 of 371
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am by admin
Most workers usually don’t know what they’re getting involved in. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
In November 1992, a manufacturers’ group, now known as the Consumer Healthcare Products Association (CHPA) proposed a case-control study that would become known as the Hemorrhagic Stroke Project (HSP). [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
The initial tests of the newly articulated standard for admissibility of opinion testimony in silicone litigation did not go well.[3]  Peer review, which was absent in the re-analyses relied upon in the Bendectin litigation, was superficially present in the studies relied upon in the silicone litigation. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm by renholding
[4] Executive Compensation Disclosure, Release No. 33-6962 (Oct. 16, 1992) [57 FR 48126 (Oct. 21, 1992)] [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Here is what the cited article, footnote 40 in “Vermin of Proof,” says: “RESULTS: The temporal trends in prevalence rates for specific birth defects examined from 1970 through 1992 did not show changes that reflected the cessation of Bendectin use over the 1980–84 period. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
O’Connor ran for the seat in her own right in 1970; she won and was re-elected again in 1972. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am by admin
§ 455 – In re School Asbestos Litigation (1992),” 38 Villanova L. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Friends, we are excited to share that the Supreme Court has just taken up Gonzalez v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm by Tomasz Tadeusz Koncewicz
Mancini in Case 294/93 Les Verts In memory of the late Professor John Usher Faced with the unprecedented and persistent backlash against its own authority coming from Poland, the Court of Justice finds itself in a delicate position: it is trapped between what is now clearly a counter-factual assertion (“common values”), on the one hand, and the pragmatic judicial path and mandate that binds the Court to the “community based on the rule law” mast against all odds, on… [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 3:00 am by Chip Merlin
His public comment to The History of Public Adjusting—Samuel Milch v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am by Josh Blackman
The only issue that gets his dander up is any perceived intrusion about the Judiciary (read John Roberts's) powers. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Arguably, we’re so immersed in them that we know more about US law, especially relating to civil rights, than we do about Canadian rights. [read post]