Search for: "In re Kimmell"
Results 1 - 20
of 136
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2024, 7:05 pm
In fact, they’re now two for two. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:52 am
[National Law Journal] * Federal judge warns Harvard lawyers that they sound ridiculous pretending like they're normal people in front of juries. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:48 am
This is a case involving a trademark owner and a competitive keyword advertiser. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Make sure you’re prepared with OsgoodePD’s National Annual Symposium on Canadian Contract Law, running December 6, 2023. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:40 am
BPI * Another Murky Opinion on Lawyers Buying Keyword Ads on Other Lawyers’ Names–In re Naert * Keyword Ad Lawsuit Isn’t Covered By California’s Anti-SLAPP Law * Confusion From Competitive Keyword Advertising? [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 8:25 am
This is a competitive keyword advertising lawsuit. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am
While this is still a low rate if we’re measuring net consumer confusion in a consumer survey, it would have been a lot more compelling if the court had expressly rejected this higher ratio. [read post]
13 May 2023, 7:30 am
BPI * Another Murky Opinion on Lawyers Buying Keyword Ads on Other Lawyers’ Names–In re Naert * Keyword Ad Lawsuit Isn’t Covered By California’s Anti-SLAPP Law * Confusion From Competitive Keyword Advertising? [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:41 am
And when you’re a star, they let you do it. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 3:48 pm
Am I glad Jimmy Kimmel is back as host? [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 6:53 am
BPI * Another Murky Opinion on Lawyers Buying Keyword Ads on Other Lawyers’ Names–In re Naert * Keyword Ad Lawsuit Isn’t Covered By California’s Anti-SLAPP Law * Confusion From Competitive Keyword Advertising? [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:15 am
Yet, because a black person was honored, we're told (by some people), comedy was inappropriate. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am
Troia was a LoanStreet employee. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 7:34 am
BPI * Another Murky Opinion on Lawyers Buying Keyword Ads on Other Lawyers’ Names–In re Naert * Keyword Ad Lawsuit Isn’t Covered By California’s Anti-SLAPP Law * Confusion From Competitive Keyword Advertising? [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:28 am
1-800 Contacts first appeared on this blog on February 9, 2005, my second day of blogging. 17 years later, I’m still blogging their ignoble trademark lawsuits. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 8:52 am
The latest armchair revolutionary is President Joe Biden himself who went on Jimmy Kimmel to do the first sit down interview in months. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 5:45 am
You're supposed to swat them, not your friends. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 8:58 am
As I note, Justice Brandeis's "answer to bad speech is more speech" concept is premised on the idea that people can respond to others' speech by saying, "You're wrong," sometimes egregiously so. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:01 am
BPI * Another Murky Opinion on Lawyers Buying Keyword Ads on Other Lawyers’ Names–In re Naert * Keyword Ad Lawsuit Isn’t Covered By California’s Anti-SLAPP Law * Confusion From Competitive Keyword Advertising? [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
BPI * Another Murky Opinion on Lawyers Buying Keyword Ads on Other Lawyers’ Names–In re Naert * Keyword Ad Lawsuit Isn’t Covered By California’s Anti-SLAPP Law * Confusion From Competitive Keyword Advertising? [read post]
