Search for: "In re Marriage of Harris" Results 1 - 20 of 271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2009, 10:27 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 08-0462, 2009 MT 226N, IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF HARRY S. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 9:00 am
Oldest Person to Get Divorced: Harry Bidwell of the United Kingdom is the oldest known divorcee. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 5:51 am by Michael
  He is familiar with the policy and procedures of the Harris and Fort Bend County Texas family law courts. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:39 am by Christine Corcos
Casey for bringing it to my attention and sharing it with me and this blog’s readers. __________________________  RE: In Re the Marriage of HARRIS, Crystal J. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 5:51 am by Michael Busby
Divorce for the Sikh Marriage In some very extreme, abnormal or rare circumstances marital breakdown, the Sangat or Panj Pyaare can give permission to someone to re-marry; however, even then there is no religious ceremony for divorce. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 6:02 am by Sam Hasler
Having discussed jurisdiction and service in Got to Have Service on the Other Side and More on Got to Have Service on the Other Side, let me bring up a recent Indiana Court of Appeals case In re: the marriage of Anthony J. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 5:08 am by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Harris, 560 NE 2d 1138 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist., 1st Div. 1990 So, if annulment is that important to you, you may want to try in another state first. [read post]
15 May 2015, 12:30 pm by Michael Busby
“In case you’re doing something you’re not happy with your mate figuring out, then you shouldn’t be doing it. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:49 am by Mary E. Ramos
 Prine is a conservative Republican that believes marriage is between a man and a woman and is also pro-life. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:42 am
We're not told of anything friendly and accommodating Harris said or did, but why not aim vague attacks at people who are not present — "a man in her position" — and, earlier — "the media, and Americans more generally"? [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 5:54 am by Above the Law
* Group tries to make Kim Davis the vehicle for re-banning marriage equality. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 12:20 am
Human Rights Act.The Board, in In re Referendum Concerning the Jury and Marriage Amendment Act of 2009, (DC Bd. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 7:01 am by Victoria Pynchon
Because it is not effective in California until marriage, however, it can be negotiated, re-negotiated, and re-re-negotiated until Ms. [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 6:04 pm by Howard Friedman
In In re Alison Clark, (9th Cir., April 24, 2013), U.S. 9th Circuit Judge Harry Pregerson, acting in his capacity as Chair of the Federal Public Defender Standing Committee, held that the Administrative Office of the United States Courts acted wrongly in denying federal health care benefits to the same-sex spouse of an Oregon assistant federal public defender. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 10:18 am by Shawn Garrison
The problem for Harry is that he does not have a prenuptial agreement. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:45 pm
Harris, 188 N.J. 415, decision of the New Jersey Supreme Court in 2006. [read post]