Search for: "In re Matthew P. (1999)" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
Another multi-district litigation (MDL) has hit a jarring speed bump. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
., a 1999 case in which the New York high court held that e-mail systems were immune from liability for allegedly defamatory material sent by their users.[11] E-mail systems aren't common carriers, but the court nonetheless reasoned that they shouldn't be held responsible for failing to block messages, even if they had the legal authority to block them: An e-mail system's "role in transmitting e-mail is akin to that of a telephone company," the court held,… [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
Some notes on vexing issue, which fortunately has never serious issue for me. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:48 pm
"What follows is a translation by Matthew Hoffman of the relevant portions of the opinion:  3.1.1. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  The learned intermediary rule could be Bob Dylan (I know, we’re showing our age, here). [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm by NFS Esq.
The following case is published below with my own commentary added in the blue fields. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 8:56 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
., P&L Partners, L.L.C., Paradise Rio Carwash, G.P., L.L.C., Sharyland Investors, Ltd., and the Shary Group, L.L.C. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by INFORRM
Matthews J held that the plaintiff had a residual reputation which was damaged by the newspaper’s allegations. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:28 am by Steven M. Taber
September 20, 2010, Volume 2, Number 27 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]