Search for: "In re Matthew W."
Results 1 - 20
of 344
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2024, 11:49 am
For all you people who think fonts don’t matter … well, you’re usually right, but not always. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
SHAWN MATTHEW CLARK, Littler Mendelson, P.C., New York, New York, for United Parcel Service Inc. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
SHAWN MATTHEW CLARK, Littler Mendelson, P.C., New York, New York, for United Parcel Service Inc. [read post]
7 May 2024, 8:31 am
Bucciero and Matthew P. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
By Thomas A. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
I raise this issue not to criticize Hasen’s appropriately focused and sober-minded book but to encourage all of us to seek deeper, broader explanations for the anti-democratic drift that now seems so evident in our country, to re-examine the links between developments in the law and what is happening in politics and society. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Neil W. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am
”[4] Matthew Butterick, an attorney for the artists alongside Joseph Saveri noted that the judge “sustained the plaintiffs’ core claim pertaining to direct copyright infringement” and expressed optimism in the claim’s path to trial and the ability to address the court’s concerns.[5] On November 29, 2023, the artists and their legal team submitted an amended complaint, 94 pages to the original complaint’s 44, adding seven artist-plaintiffs: Gerald… [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:55 am
” According to Sarah Matthews, the White House Deputy Press Secretary, Trump resisted using the word “peaceful” even at this juncture – and only agreed to include it in a tweet after Ivanka pressed for it. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am
If it’s the case that people are interacting w/businesses as if they’re people, that might provoke a lens of ways in which consumers are likely to be confused or not [or what counts as acceptable criticism, given the comparison to defamation]. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:05 am
[With thanks to Matthew Chinery.] [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 4:51 am
Dasl Yoon and Timothy W. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 8:16 am
" Contents include: Bruno Demeyere, Protection of the Environment During Armed Conflict Interview with Marja Lehto: Former International Law Commission Special Rapporteur on the Protection of the Environment in Relation to Armed Conflicts Helen Obregón Gieseken & Vanessa Murphy, The protection of the natural environment under international humanitarian law: The ICRC's 2020 Guidelines Rigmor Argren, The obligation to prevent environmental harm in relation to armed… [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:07 am
" Wehner is a former George W. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 1:40 pm
(They could potentially argue that they’re not bound by federal law because they’re Congress and make the law, etc.) [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
“[W]e must now urgently develop a broad regulatory regime for over-the-counter derivatives. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Evid. 413 victim's testimony against the risk of confusing the issues and creating a "distracting mini-trial" re-litigating appellant's prior acquittal and potentially misleading the members does not favor admission. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
If you’re having trouble understanding the difference, Josh Chafetz has the best articulation of the “strong” version of the MQD: “If a majority of justices determine that eating an ice cream cone is a major question, then it is not enough that Congress has empowered the agency to ‘eat any dessert it chooses. [read post]
