Search for: "In re Nina S." Results 1 - 20 of 581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2024, 4:03 am by Jasmijn de Groot (Brinkhof)
The Dutch first instance court limited a patent’s scope of protection based on the Dutch translation of the claims. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:40 am by Nina Ferara (Porsche AG)
This can be done concurrently with re-sitting the failed papers M, but those papers will only be marked if the candidate passes paper F. [read post]
  As has been made clear by the Court of Appeal in cases such as R v Foreign Secretary (No. 2) [2010] EWCA Civ 158, the purpose of providing an embargoed draft to the parties is not to enable them to re-argue the merits of the case. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
In short, there’s nothing surprising here: we’re in line with European Union law. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
In short, there’s nothing surprising here: we’re in line with European Union law. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:00 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Werner, Sisyphus in robes: International law, legal interpretation and the absurd Nina Reiners, States as bystanders of legal change: Alternative paths for the human rights to water and sanitation in international law Eliana Cusato & Emily Jones, The ‘imbroglio’ of ecocide: A political economic analysis International Law and Practice Louis Bélanger & Jean-Frédéric Morin, Treaty amendment procedures: A typology from a survey of multilateral… [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:02 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
“It’s incumbent upon us as water managers to capture and store as much water as possible during the wet times like we’re seeing now because we never know when drought conditions will return,” he said. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 10:01 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Then the management thinks: we’re not going there because that’s already blocked. [read post]
A second instance decision is “re-examination” and not examination, as also indicated in Opinion #00016/2023/CGPI/PFE-INPI/PGF/AGU – published in BRPTO´s Official gazette #2762 on December 12, 2023 – when addressing formal issues to administrative appeals. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 6:47 am by David Pocklington
Support Both the reviewers and the Church recognise that giving information to this review has the potential to be re-traumatising for victims and survivors. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:19 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Then the management thinks: we’re not going there because that’s already blocked. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 7:40 am by jonathanturley
(If you’re wondering why, I suggest you “educate yourself” about radical feminism. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:37 pm by centerforartlaw
”[28] When crediting a derivative work, re-users can use the following format: This work, “ Derivative Work’s Title,” is a derivative of “Original Work’s Title” is licensed under CC (BY-other license element if applicable) version of license by [reuser’s name]. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 7:53 am by Bart van Wezenbeek (Hoffmann Eitle)
There is no “absolute” right to oral proceedings upon a party’s request, but it is subject to inherent restrictions by the EPC and procedural principles generally recognised in the Contracting States of the EPO. [read post]