Search for: "In re P. I. (1989)"
Results 1 - 20
of 454
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2024, 7:07 pm
" House Office of the Legislative Counsel, Style Manual; Drafting Suggestions for the Trained Drafter §102(c), p. 2 (1989); see also D. [read post]
21 May 2024, 12:08 am
And so you're like, well, I better say it because no one else is saying it. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:16 pm
In an informal discussion I once had with a leading Australian barrister, I was asked ‘what does “the rules of private international law” here actually mean? [read post]
3 May 2024, 2:58 am
Below is a slightly fuller version of what I said. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTES [1] 841 F.2d 502 (3d Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1114 (1989). [2] 563 U.S. 804 (2011). [3] In re MicroStrategy Inc. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Rev. 849 (1989). [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Joiner had can cause small-cell lung cancer.[13] Perhaps the most egregious lapses in scholarship occur when Ranges, a newly minted scientist, and her co-author, a full professor of law, write: “For example, Bendectin, an antinausea medication prescribed to pregnant women, caused a slew of birth defects (hence its nickname ‘The Second Thalidomide’).49”[14] I had to re-read this sentence many times to make sure I was not hallucinating. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
One criticism has been that the permanent members have influenced the appointment of experts with regard to non-proliferation sanctions regimes, with potential implications for their independence.[8] Sanctions Types of Sanctions Arms Embargo Travel Ban Assets Freeze Charcoal Ban Illicit Petrol-eumExport IED Comp- onent Ban Trans-port Customs Controls Other Measures[9] Al-Shabaab Sanctions X X X X X 1267, 1989 and 2253 ISIL (D’aesh) & Al-Qaida Sanctions… [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:25 pm
People, 780 P.2d 471, 473 (Colo. 1989); accord Jacobsen, 466 U.S. at 113. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 7:28 pm
It is with that in mind that in this and several posts that follow I will review Knowledge in Change. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 7:19 am
It is with that in mind that in this and several posts that follow I will review Knowledge in Change. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:42 am
“[P]reponderance of the evidence…[is showing] allegations of abuse are more probably true than not. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Ramsey [Lisa P. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 2:14 pm
Fazzini, 871 F.2d 635, 641 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 4:48 am
The post Understanding Parental Alienation: Will I Lose My Child if Allegations of Parental Alienation are Accepted? [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 2:37 am
The post UNDERSTANDING PARENTAL ALIENATION: WILL I LOSE MY CHILD IF ALLEGATIONS OF PARENTAL ALIENATION ARE ACCEPTED? [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
I call these scientific Dred Scott cases, which illustrate that sometimes science has no criteria of validity that the law is bound to respect. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm
II, p. 248). [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
“I further indicated a number of unlawful means, including more additional false statements, including statements that were planned to be made to tax authorities. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:43 am
Harper itself adopts the approach the SCC took in Reference re Prov. [read post]
