Search for: "In re R. B." Results 1 - 20 of 12,086
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2024, 5:11 am by Michael Oykhman
You’re waving a firearm around to display that it’s on your person even if you don’t intend on firing it You store your firearms loaded You transport your firearms loaded You fail to use a locking device on certain firearms when storing them Defences A strong defence to a charge of unsafe storage of a firearm will depend on the circumstances of one’s case. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:21 am by Michael Oykhman
Regarding a reasonable expectation of privacy, a recent decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in R v Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10 noted that people have a reasonable expectation of privacy in an area, location or circumstance if the person does not expect to be secretly recorded or observed. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Michael Oykhman
Accessing child pornography (4.1) Every person who accesses any child pornography is guilty of (a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 10 years and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of one year; or (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction and is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years less a day and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of six months. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
En l’espèce, l’appelant ne saurait bénéficier de sa conduite empreinte de mauvaise foi. [read post]
31 May 2024, 12:02 pm by Alessandro Cerri
In a recent decision (R 1397-2022-5), the Fifth Board of Appeal (the Board) of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) took the unusual step of suspending an opposition appeal so as to remand the trade mark application to the Examiner for an examination on the basis of absolute grounds of refusal. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:42 am by Giles Peaker
Mr C’s position was that of a person in ‘accommodation plus’ need, as per R (Aburas) v London Borough of Southwark (2019) EWHC 2754 (Admin). [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
On 24 May 2024 judgment on meaning was handed down by HHJ Lewis in Unity Plus Healthcare Ltd v Clay & Ors (Re Preliminary Issues) [2024] EWHC 1278 (KB). [read post]
26 May 2024, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Le juge de première instance a déclaré nulle et inopposable à l’endroit des intimés, bénéficiaires de l’assurance-vie de l’assuré, la clause d’exclusion intitulée «Suicide» figurant aux «Dispositions générales» du contrat d’assurance. [read post]
21 May 2024, 11:09 am by Alyzza Austriaco
Arthur Orr (R) said it “just allowed a doctor to do what they’re already doing without any fear of reprisal from the State Medical Board,” adding that there are often FDA-approved drugs that can help treat ailments they weren’t initially intended to treat. ( ALABAMA REFLECTOR , LEXISNEXIS STATE NET) U.S. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:17 am by Phil Dixon
§ 1326 makes it a crime to re-enter the United States after having been removed, deported, or denied entry. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
The Crown can then rebut this presumption for the purposes of the analysis under the curative proviso in s. 686(1)(b)(iv). [read post]
18 May 2024, 7:41 am by Russell Knight
R. 103(b) Rule 103(b) exists to encourage parties to resolve their disputes quickly in or out of court. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
Scotland, Northern Ireland), but is rather subject to re-examination by the competent court (e.g. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
” SEC Rule 240.21F-4(b)(4)(iii)(B) provides for this 120-exception for compliance and audit whistleblowers. [read post]