Search for: "In re Reed (1983)"
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Reed re- quested DNA testing on certain evidence, including the belt used to strangle Stites, which Reed contended would help identify the true perpetrator. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 6:13 pm
Then Reed repackaged his cert petition as a Section 1983 motion in federal district court. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
§1983 action for further proceedings on the merits. [read post]
17 Sep 2022, 8:19 am
You're in a movie theater. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 10:50 am
Cir. 1983). [read post]
28 May 2022, 2:25 pm
The Supreme Court has re-affirmed this common law framework in the Warren case and its progeny like Castle Rock, etc. [read post]
4 May 2022, 8:20 am
As a panel, we're duty-bound to follow precedent. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 11:32 am
This week, there are no new relists, and but for two-time relist Reed v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
Okla. 1983), held that the "Miss Gay America Pageant"—a slightly misleading title for a cross-dressing pageant, in which men (whether or not gay) competed in female impersonation, id. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 4:30 am
As one court explained, “Clear and convincing evidence is a higher, more demanding standard than the preponderance [of the evidence] standard” that typically applies in civil cases, requiring “evidence that is neither equivocal nor open to opposing presumptions” (In re Duane II, 151 AD3d 1129 [3d Dept 2017]). [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[71] Justice Arbour noted that, in explaining the standard to a jury, it might be preferable to re-word the standard of causation using positive terms, for example, a phrase such as a “‘significant contributing cause’ rather than using expressions phrased in the negative such as ‘not a trivial cause’ or ‘not insignificant’. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
See In re D.W.G., 391 S.W.3d 154, 164 (Te [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 10:20 am
Council, 724 F.2d 658, 661 (8th Cir. 1983) ("the protection of the First Amendment extends to proceedings for contempt"); In re Motion for Civil Contempt by John Doe, 2016 WL 3460368, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 7:42 am
Reed, 89 B.R. 100 (CD Cal. 1988); Rund v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:16 pm
Headley, 6 Ohio St.3d 475, 478-79, 453 N.E.2d 716 (1983), the Ohio Supreme Court explained that this provision`guarantees the accused that the essential facts constituting the offense for which he is tried will be found in the indictment of the grand jury. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 11:33 am
Id.; See also In re Reed, 11 B.R. 755 (Bankr. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
This post is from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog. [read post]
5 May 2016, 6:59 am
Reed, 2003-Ohio-6536 (extrinsic impeachment may be used when a witness says that he cannot remember making a prior statement) Crawford v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 1:27 pm
The quantum of proof required to prove kinship is a fair preponderance of the credible evidence (Matter of Jennings, 6 AD3d 867 [3d Dept 2004]; Matter of Whelan, 93 AD2d 891 [2d Dept 1983], affd 62 NY2d 657 [1984]). [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Because doing the job right would require research well beyond prescription medical products, we looked for research help, and enterprising (pun intended) Reed Smith associate Kevin Hara stepped up to handle the initial spadework. [read post]
