Search for: "In re Rojas"
Results 1 - 20
of 94
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2024, 3:00 am
“We’re not kindergarten. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 6:43 pm
Les luthiers: El reír de los cantares. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 12:17 am
Pero al descender al caso concreto hay líneas rojas que imponen flexibilidad a la administración: Ciertamente la parte recurrente no utilizó el cauce legalmente adecuado para la presentación del recurso de alzada. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 4:20 am
Rick Rojas and Jessica Jaglois report for the New York Times. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 6:33 pm
An way one looks at it, the situation in Cuba produces far more cynicism than it does either hope or re¡course to some saving ideology. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:43 am
Why the Colorado Supreme Court Got it Wrong in Rojas V. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 10:31 pm
” New York TimesTop 10 Nonprofit Tweets: Lucy Bernholz: We’re not counting all that counts #HowWeGiveNow What happened to giving money to charity? [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 7:55 am
Circuit Court Group 3: Line 91 Judge Lody Jean Group 20: Line 93 Judge Robert Watson Group 34: Line 95 Ariel Rodriguez Group 52: Line 96 (former) Judge Jason Bloch County Court Group 5: Line 99 re-elect Judge Fred Seraphin (this one is important!) [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm
The claim, including any cause of action for "fraud on the court," is barred by the doctrines of res judicata (see Rojas v Romanoff, 186 AD3d 103, 108 [1st Dept 2020]) and collateral estoppel (see Conason v Megan Holding, LLC, 25 NY3d 1, 17 [2015]) based on dismissal of the "identical parallel federal court action" and a prior order of this Court affirming the orders that claimant now essentially seeks review of (Moskovits v Bank of Am. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm
The claim, including any cause of action for "fraud on the court," is barred by the doctrines of res judicata (see Rojas v Romanoff, 186 AD3d 103, 108 [1st Dept 2020]) and collateral estoppel (see Conason v Megan Holding, LLC, 25 NY3d 1, 17 [2015]) based on dismissal of the "identical parallel federal court action" and a prior order of this Court affirming the orders that claimant now essentially seeks review of (Moskovits v Bank of Am. [read post]
27 May 2022, 4:00 am
See Rojas v. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:43 am
The Ninth Circuit recently considered when consumers assent to terms through interacting with a website: Berman v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 6:47 am
(3) Rojas v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 4:40 am
“This action is barred by the doctrine of res judicata (claim preclusion) (see generally Matter of Hunter, 4 NY3d 260, 269 [2005]). [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 2:02 am
If you’re comfortable while you’re doing it, you’re probably doing it wrong. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 12:00 am
‘Get on the Team or Shut Up’: How Trump created an army of GOP enforcers Politico – David Siders and Stephanie Murray | Published: 7/13/2021 From the earliest days of his presidency, Donald Trump and his political team worked to re-engineer the infrastructure of the Republican Party, installing allies in top leadership posts in key states. [read post]
19 May 2021, 2:38 am
“This action is barred by the doctrine of res judicata (claim preclusion) (see generally Matter of Hunter, 4 NY3d 260, 269 [2005]). [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 3:47 am
Leamos junto por favor, LAS LETRAS ROJAS SON MIS RESPUESTAS. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
The Ninth Circuit has given us some unique FOIA decisions in recent years—think of Rojas v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
National/Federal America’s Governors Get Tested for a Virus That Is Testing Them New York Times – Manny Fernandez, Rick Rojas, Shawn Huber, and Mike Baker | Published: 7/13/2020 Governors have always been judged on their disaster responses, but the coronavirus wreaking havoc across the country these days does not recede like floodwaters and cannot be tamed by calling out the National Guard. [read post]
