Search for: "In re Ronald H."
Results 1 - 20
of 201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
It wasn’t long ago when a Republican president named Ronald Reagan thundered, “Mr. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Harold H. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
As a particularly lucid treatment, see Peter H. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 8:12 am
Pix Credit Museum Panama City, Panama For those who might have an interest, I have posted for comment or reaction, a discussion draft of my essay, Overcoming the Human, Rights, and the State in Human Rights. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 12:56 am
The three Attorneys General, on behalf of whom the amicus brief was filed, served under four different Republican Presidents: Ronald Reagan, George H. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
In re Abbott, 954 f.3d 772 (5th Cir. 2020), vacated, 141 S. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Others have gone down this dubious path before, but these authors’ embrace of the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ opinion in Bendectin litigation reveals the insubstantiality and the invalidity of their method.[18] As Professor Ronald Allen put the matter: “Given the weight of evidence in favor of Bendectin’s safety, it seems peculiar to argue for mosaic evidence [WOE] from a case in which it would have plainly been misleading. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 11:16 am
" easy call) is that this man is not qualified to run, the Court should not say, "We're unwilling to decide. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am
Frank,*Frank H. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Logan H. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 3:52 pm
2019-02, pp 1-35 Brand, Ronald A. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
If you’re having trouble understanding the difference, Josh Chafetz has the best articulation of the “strong” version of the MQD: “If a majority of justices determine that eating an ice cream cone is a major question, then it is not enough that Congress has empowered the agency to ‘eat any dessert it chooses. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:01 am
Editor’s Note: Since the war began in 2022, Ukraine has fitfully exported its grain to the world market, with Russia often interrupting, or threatening to interrupt, this flow. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 2:20 am
2019-02, pp 1-35 Brand, Ronald A. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 1:46 pm
by Neil H. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 11:35 am
Arnold H. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 6:55 pm
Commentary navigates most soundly within the kingdom of text; it can meander elsewhere but then it changes its character—to polemic, program, re-education, and the like, for the greater glory of those whose collar the commentary wears.[6]While it is tempting to focus on its consequences, the challenges of text for producing explanation, analysis deserves sustained attention. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 1:50 pm
by Neil H. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 12:49 am
2019-02, pp 1-35 Brand, Ronald A. [read post]
