Search for: "In re S. Cooper III, amended"
Results 1 - 20
of 272
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2017, 6:07 am
Cooper, Luke A. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:06 am
Prior to the bill’s final passage, the Congressional Research Service publicly expressed the view that the Amendment applied to cooperation with the ICC. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:41 pm
‘‘(iii) GROUNDS FOR DECISION. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
Scotland, Northern Ireland), but is rather subject to re-examination by the competent court (e.g. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:28 pm
On May 17, 2011, Canada's Controlled Goods Directorate (division of Public Works and Government Services Canada) issued notice "NOTICE TO CONTROLLED GOODS PROGRAM REGISTRANTS REGARDING INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC IN ARMS REGULATIONS AMENDMENTS". [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm
The fact that a corporation’s lawyers and their contacts have been unable to secure cooperation may be an explanation for a corporation’s insufficient response, but it does not excuse it. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:19 am
SC13-1541 ____________ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.220. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:19 am
SC13-1541 ____________ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.220. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 4:09 am
And regardless of how Oliver fares with the damage question down in Columbus, they’re right. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:40 pm
So, we’re in Contract in what is already the hairiest deal of my year. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 11:15 am
I mean, there it is in Article III. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
By Richard Cooper, Luke Barefoot, Adam Brenneman and Antonio Pietrantoni1 If there is one thing that all stakeholders in Puerto Rico’s fiscal crisis can agree on (and there are likely not many such things), it is that, without real economic growth, the commonwealth of Puerto Rico will neither be able to repay its creditors nor offer its residents a viable, let alone prosperous, future. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
, and we're thrilled our court is reaching the right result here. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
Res. 965 makes clear, a designated proxy is merely the vehicle for an absent member’s vote, not the determiner of it. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
For this post we consider the first part of section III of the materials: III.C. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 9:00 pm
The result has been a missed opportunity to re-assert Congress’ constitutional powers and reign in Trumpian excess.So why only a D? [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
That expands Article III standing quite broadly. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 6:50 am
STOCK COOPERATIVE QUESTION: I’m on our bylaw rewrite committee and we’re stymied. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 1:34 am
Under the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Fifth Amendment privilege, you can take the Fifth for the act of handing over evidence to the government if, in doing so, you "tell" them something they don't know. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 1:34 pm
Citing the court’s three-factor stay standard articulated in In re Brimonidine Patent Litig., No. 07-md-1866 (D. [read post]