Search for: "In re SCHOOL DIST. NO. 62."
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Dist. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 8:10 am
Maple Run Unified School Dist. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 3:52 pm
She received her medical degree from the University of Chicago-Pritzker School of Medicine and a Master of Science degree in community medicine from the Mount Sinai School of Medicine. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Res. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
The Development Committee for the third edition included Co-Chairs, Professor Jerome Kassirer, of Tufts University School of Medicine, and the Hon. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Bay Area Air Quality Management District (2015) 62 Cal.4th 369, the court noted that CEQA requires a focus on the projects impact on the environment, not the environment’s impact on the project to conclude that petitioners had improperly framed the fair argument test. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Bay Area Air Quality Management District (2015) 62 Cal.4th 369, the court noted that CEQA requires a focus on the projects impact on the environment, not the environment’s impact on the project to conclude that petitioners had improperly framed the fair argument test. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
For more information see: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/press_room/press_releases/2021/pr08042021_delta_emergency_regulation.pdf https://oal.ca.gov/emergency_regulations/emergency_regulations_under_review/ Antelope Valley Groundwater Cases (2021) 62 Cal.App.5th 992 – California Appellate Court Limited Groundwater Pumping In An Overdrafted Basin In Antelope Valley Groundwater Cases. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
For more information see: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/press_room/press_releases/2021/pr08042021_delta_emergency_regulation.pdf https://oal.ca.gov/emergency_regulations/emergency_regulations_under_review/ Antelope Valley Groundwater Cases (2021) 62 Cal.App.5th 992 – California Appellate Court Limited Groundwater Pumping In An Overdrafted Basin In Antelope Valley Groundwater Cases. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
Santa Clara Valley Water Dist. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
Santa Clara Valley Water Dist. v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:51 am
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., 2014-Ohio-2998 (2nd Dist.) [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Alan received his Juris Doctor degree from the University of Michigan Law School in 1972. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Ackerman is a 1972 graduate of the University of Michigan Law School. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
Westlands Water Dist. (2014) 227 Cal.App.4th 832, the court reasoned that: Petitioner could point to no evidence in the record to identify an environmental impact that would result from the size of the plant, its location, health effects on populations near the site, or impacts on marine life in light of the existing conditions; The Commission was not obligated to follow a hyperlink in a comment letter to identify purported evidence supporting its claim that the extension would lead to an… [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am
In the Note, James agreed to re-pay Moncor $10,690.37 in principal, plus interest, with her monthly payment set at $171.82. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
California Dept. of Fish & Wildlife (2015) 62 Cal.4th 204. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:06 pm
Jody James Farms, JV v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 4:55 pm
Vol. 62 no. 2, Campinas Apr. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
BAAQMD (2015) 62 Cal.4th 369, holding that, as a general rule, CEQA does not require an effect of the existing environment on a project’s future occupants or users, the court held that BAAQMD’s receptor thresholds could not be used to evaluate effects on future users, because to do so could trigger the need to prepare an EIR solely because the emissions in the existing environment meet the thresholds as to future users. [read post]
