Search for: "In re Thomas M. and Michael M."
Results 1 - 20
of 581
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2024, 2:06 pm
I am delighted to announce that the International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique has published its Vol. 37(4), a special issue edited by Rob Kahn, Simona Stano, and Mario Ricca--Subjectivities, Religion, Discrimination: Spaces and Lexical Imaginaries for Ubiquitous Justice. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
Trump provided any guidance to the court: And then the question becomes, as we’ve been exploring heretoday a little bit, about how to segregate private from official conduct that may or maynot enjoy some immunity, and we—I’m sure we’re going to spend a lot of time exploring that. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:30 pm
(Re:). [read post]
7 May 2024, 3:00 am
“This is all we’re ever going to have,” Mallory wrote in June 2011, at the end of her freshman year at Stanford, “so if you’re not actively pursuing happiness then you’re insane. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 2:05 pm
Left to right: Sam Poloche, William Alden Elliot Joshua Eyer Thomas M. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:37 am
And did you know they’re going up? [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm
We’re representing the United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
Another multi-district litigation (MDL) has hit a jarring speed bump. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:04 pm
Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The initial tests of the newly articulated standard for admissibility of opinion testimony in silicone litigation did not go well.[3] Peer review, which was absent in the re-analyses relied upon in the Bendectin litigation, was superficially present in the studies relied upon in the silicone litigation. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 8:05 am
Prominent takings litigators Michael Berger and Robert Thomas have helpful summaries of the facts and what the court decided. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 10:15 am
Justice Clarence Thomas, for example, pointedly asked, “[i]f a very interested buyer showed up the day after Michael died, would Thomas sell the business to him for 3.86 million? [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Michael A. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am
I’m feeling very depleted by having to teach it. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
Indeed, to call it a “too clever by half … cabalistic overreading” (see Michael Dorf, quoting Akhil Amar) might, if anything, give it too much credit. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Michael Luttig, who served on the U.S. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 3:56 pm
Thomas and Kumudha N. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:00 am
I’m sitting here and I’m telling you, you’re wrong about these things, and you don’t listen … you refuse to listen to what I’m saying to you. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
In re Abbott, 954 f.3d 772 (5th Cir. 2020), vacated, 141 S. [read post]
