Search for: "In re Thomas R. (1991)" Results 1 - 20 of 130
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
The initial tests of the newly articulated standard for admissibility of opinion testimony in silicone litigation did not go well.[3]  Peer review, which was absent in the re-analyses relied upon in the Bendectin litigation, was superficially present in the studies relied upon in the silicone litigation. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 6:14 am by admin
App. 2013 (mentioning Kramer as plaintiffs’ expert witness); In re Chan [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 4:06 am by Emma Snell
Mike Rogers (R-AL), Mike Turner (R-OH) and Michael McCaul (R-TX). [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 2:36 pm by Aaron Moss
For a standard that ends up driving the fair use narrative, we’re really not getting much guidance. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
On 16 February 2022, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in ZXC v Bloomberg [2022] UKSC 5. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
Included are the per curiam opinion, the concurrence of JJ Gorsuch, Thomas and Alito, and the dissenting opinion of JJ Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
From 1991-2019, the number of civilian-owned firearms in the United States more than doubled, to an estimated 434 million. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
I believed Anita Hill in 1991, when she testified about her sexual harassment by Clarence Thomas. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am by Eugene Volokh
[A forthcoming article of mine in the New York University Journal of Law & Liberty.] [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
Meese (1991): In our case, the Advisory Commission had no … tie to prosecutorial power nor authority to censor publications. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 5:16 am by David Bernstein
The Harvard Crimson reported in 1972 that Davis "explained that the situation of Jews in Russia 'has been totally blown out of proportion by the bourgeois press because they're going to do everything they can to discredit socialism.'" Not incidentally, she was and remains [link has her engaging in a modern version of blood libel by ridiculously linking Israel to police violence against blacks in the U.S.] an antisemite, and it's rather… [read post]
8 May 2021, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
Nadine Strossen (New York Law School, and former President of the ACLU, 1991-2008), and I sent to the President of CMU arguing in favor of reinstating Prof. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
Some notes on vexing issue, which fortunately has never serious issue for me. [read post]
  This follows his 4 December 2020 judgment in Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Limited & Flynn Pharma Limited v Generics UK Limited (t/a Mylan) & Mylan UK Healthcare Limited [2020] EWHC 3270 (Pat) (the “Judgment”). [read post]