Search for: "In re W. R. W."
Results 1 - 20
of 5,624
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2024, 8:17 am
§ 1326 makes it a crime to re-enter the United States after having been removed, deported, or denied entry. [read post]
21 May 2024, 6:25 am
» Und: «Anders wäre zu urteilen, wenn zusätzliche Zeichenelemente wie Wörter oder Bilder direkt einen anderen Sinngehalt des Wortes ‹Bimbo› als den rassistischen nahelegen würden. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:00 am
Zarow, 2024 QCCA 441Juridiction : Cour d’appel (C.A.), MontréalDécision de : Juges Stephen W. [read post]
18 May 2024, 7:41 am
R. 103(b) Rule 103(b) exists to encourage parties to resolve their disputes quickly in or out of court. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
Nov. 4, 2020: Former Secretary of Energy in the Trump administration, Rick Perry texts White House Chief of State Mark Meadows proposing an“AGRESSIVE[sic] STRATEGY” to have state legislatures ignore the will of their voters and deliver their states’ electors to Trump: “HERE’s an AGRESSIVE[sic] STRATEGY: Why can t (sic) the states of GA NC PENN and other R controlled state houses declare this is BS (where conflicts and election not called that night) and just… [read post]
3 May 2024, 2:58 am
Other regulatory reports in England & Wales in this period (Ormrod, Benson, Marr, Wood) barely acknowledged the idea of legal edtech, let alone explored it.1 The Legal Education & Training Review (LETR) was the first report to comment extensively on legal edtech in E+W. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
Could President George W. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
In der Praxis müssen Verantwortliche bei der Meldung von Datenschutz-Verletzungen Prioritäten setzen.Die Meldung an allenfalls mehr als 40 Aufsichtsbehörden gleichzeitig innert 72 Stunden wäre in den meisten Fällen gar nicht machbar.Aus schweizerischer Sicht sind in einem ersten Schritt zeitnahe Meldungen – jeweils sofern erforderlich – beim EDÖB und bei der Aufsichtsbehörde am Ort der EU-Datenschutz-Vertretung… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:04 am
R. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Gagnon, 2024 QCCA 343Juridiction : Cour d’appel (C.A.), QuébecDécision de : Juges Stephen W. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 3:59 am
D’autre part, le fait que les revenus engendrés par une police exonérée soient exemptés d’impôt ne permet pas d’exclure l’application de l’article 87 w) de la Loi sur les impôts. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 2:20 pm
Dies ist schwierig, wenn sich diese Dokumente während eines laufenden Verfahrens mehrmals ändern. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 7:01 pm
By Sara W. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:00 am
R J Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 5:31 am
Each matter is unique – and we’re not in the business of shilling for any particular software provider. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 1:01 pm
Comm’r of Internal Revenue, No. 16217-22 (U.S.T.C. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:23 am
Ausnahmen bestehen im Wesentlichen nur insoweit, als Fehler im Konsultationsverfahren aus der Sphäre des Betriebsrats stammen oder Fehler bei der Massenentlassungsanzeige lediglich die sog. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:41 am
Die Abschaffung wäre schlimm, weil sie symbolhaft für das Desinteresse des deutschen Staates an einer wirksamen Durchsetzung des Datenschutzes steht. [read post]
