Search for: "In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. V. and S. V., Parents"
Results 1 - 20
of 76
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
Article 8, no contact as an interference in the child’s right to family life with her other parent). [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:17 am
Clause 6(iii) makes clear that “children under 16 must not be…photographed on issues involving their own or another child’s welfare unless a custodial parent or similarly responsible adult consents”. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Major decision making with respect to the children’s health, education, and welfare would usually be made by the mother as the primary caregiving parent. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:19 am
"] From C.M. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 10:29 am
The approach in law is that set out by Lord Steyn in Re S and in respect of the requirement for ‘compelling reasons’ the judgment in A v Ward must be regarded as per incuriam and should not be followed. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 6:36 am
From C.M. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 1:03 pm
In F v M [2023] EWFC 5, Hayden J (building on Re A) opined that “The filter exists to protect the child and, not infrequently, the parent with whom the child lives. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
It is therefore important to adopt measures to protect the general welfare and the interest of the collectivity as a whole under the concept of public order (ordre public). [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Court Upholds Removal of Child From Parents, Related to Child's Transgender Identity
21 Oct 2022, 3:45 pm
The FCM explained that it "was not a matter of who's right or who's wrong […], it's just more of a matter of ensuring [Child's] safety. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
The child welfare and juvenile justice systems are both plagued by systemic and structural racism. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
As to the applicable standard of review when assessing a hearing judge’s conclusions concerning custody in a child welfare context, Van de Perre v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
In Appleton, Mostyn conceded he might have gone a bit far there, and of course the Re S balancing exercise would still need to be carried out (see Re S (A Child) [2004] UKHL 47, which sets out the exercise judges must carry out to decide issues that engage competing convention rights, under Article 8 private and family life and Article 10 freedom of expression). [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Governor Greg Abbott’s recent directive ordering the child welfare agency to investigate all gender-affirming care for trans children as child abuse is a particularly cruel example of this.A trial court in Texas has issued a temporary restraining order that prevents Abbott and his lackeys from acting on the order (Doe v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am
And that’s what this post is about. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
We do not think it can fairly be argued that Lieven J’s conclusion, in the unusual circumstances of this case, was wrong. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 3:47 am
Re S (Parental Alienation: Cult) [2020] In Re S, the child was born in 2011 and her parents split before her first birthday. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 9:05 am
Fall & Curtis J. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 9:05 am
Fall & Curtis J. [read post]
