Search for: "In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: R. V. M., Parent"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
The wording is cumbersome and worth reminding ourselves of, since it is often inaccurately summarised or paraphrased: ‘A court…is…to presume, unless the contrary is shown, that involvement of that parent in the life of the child concerned will further the child’s welfare’. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 8:21 am
I’m going to appoint a Guardian Ad Litem? [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am
’ and which reminded me that I’d wanted for a while to write something looking at the meaning of coercive and controlling behaviour (or CCB), because sometimes I’m not sure we’re all singing from the same hymn sheet. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
I’m not sure why they think a signature is all it takes to terminate a parent-child relationship…because that’s definitely not how it works in Illinois. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
The Code does not typically have special rules for special areas of practice, but family violence is not strictly a family law matter. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:01 am
¶1 After nearly four years of contested litigation in a child custody case, the district court entered a default order against Michaela M. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:59 pm
My excellent pro bono local counsel Jeffrey M. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
See also Mass R. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
Once the amendments come into force, coercive control will be a factor in considering the best interests of the child when making parenting and contact orders, and in relocation applications. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm
And so the matter came to hearing. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 6:53 am
R. 5.636(d). [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 6:53 am
R. 5.636(d). [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
’ (Welfare and Institutions Code section § 730, subd. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 1:18 pm
Instead, the court’s focus, and that of the parties, must be the welfare of the child. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:54 am
In re Baby M, 217 N.J. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 7:22 am
In re Baby M, 109 N.J. 396 (1988); see also E.E. v. [read post]
