Search for: "In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: V. L. and A. R., Parents"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
The wording is cumbersome and worth reminding ourselves of, since it is often inaccurately summarised or paraphrased: ‘A court…is…to presume, unless the contrary is shown, that involvement of that parent in the life of the child concerned will further the child’s welfare’. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am
Last week HHJ Dancey published a second judgment in a case involving allegations of rape and domestic abuse including coercive and controlling behaviour (the judgment is A Child (Application of PD12J : No.2 – Findings of Fact) [2022] EWFC 2). [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
(g) Failure to protect the child from conditions within his environment injurious to the child’s welfare. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 5:26 am
” Wickham v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:59 pm
It is only in rare instances that courts allow closed and anonymous proceedings, and these usually involve matter such as "abortion, birth control, and welfare prosecutions involving abandoned or illegitimate children. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
See also Mass R. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
Once the amendments come into force, coercive control will be a factor in considering the best interests of the child when making parenting and contact orders, and in relocation applications. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm
And so the matter came to hearing. [read post]
12 May 2017, 2:49 pm
’ (In re Victor L. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
’ (In re Binh L. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
And a parent may ‘curtail a child's exercise of the constitutional rights . . . [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm
Nearly two decades ago David L. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
Respondent on April 12, 1994 filed a motion returnable April 27, 1994 seeking re-argument of the dispositional order dated April 7, 1994. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:54 am
L. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
The trial court ruled against Susan in both matters. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
In Kansas v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:28 am
Parent’s Incarceration Not an Automatic Reason for Blocking Visitation In Matter of Granger v Miscercola, --- N.E.2d ----, 2013 WL 1798581 (N. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Frazier v. [read post]
