Search for: "In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. M. S. and A. M. A., Parents" Results 1 - 20 of 145
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
But whether one’s view is that more work is to be done or that the pendulum has swung too far, it is useful to consider: how significant a role does the statutory presumption actually play when we are thinking about making sound, safe, welfare based decisions for children? [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Neither parent was working and they were living in tight quarters with the childrens great-grandparents in San Pedro, Paulo said. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:19 pm
I'm not a fan -- at all -- of having kids watch domestic violence between their parents, or having kids be watched, or driven, by an alcoholic parent. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 1:03 pm by Russell Knight
” In re Custody of McCuan, 531 NE 2d 102 – Ill: Appellate Court, 5th Dist. 1988 “In view of [one spouse’s] much greater ability to pay, we think it was an abuse of discretion to make [the other spouse] pay most of the [childrens] attorney’s fees” In re Marriage of Kennedy, 418 NE 2d 947 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist. 1981 Guardian Ad Litem fees seem to have no limit beyond what the… [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am by Joel R. Brandes
 August 2, 2023Appellate Division, First DepartmentAge 29 Law allows unmarried children through age 29, regardless of financial dependence, to be covered under a parents group health insurance policy  In B.D. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 10:23 am by Michael C. Dorf
The Supremacy Clause tells state judges they are "bound" by federal law notwithstanding contrary provisions of state law, but that's also true of state legislative and executive officials even though they're not expressly mentioned. [read post]
16 May 2023, 12:01 am by Josh Richman
And it's not so much a matter of accessibility as it is really thinking about what do we need to do to make sure that the technology is useful? [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 10:29 am by familoo
In accordance with Re S, there should be no default position, or requirement for ‘compelling reasons’, in such cases. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 1:33 pm by Bridget Crawford
  Rethinking Family Regulation This panel will interrogate the structural harms imbedded in the family regulation system, including its roots in punitive public welfare regimes, disparate harms in Black and Indigenous communities, discrimination against parents with disabilities, and the system’s recent intramentalization in efforts to remove children from their homes who seek gender-affirming care. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 1:23 pm by Bridget Crawford
Rethinking Family Regulation This panel will interrogate the structural harms imbedded in the family regulation system, including its roots in punitive public welfare regimes, disparate harms in Black and Indigenous communities, discrimination against parents with disabilities, and the system’s recent intramentalization in efforts to remove children from their homes who seek gender-affirming care. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 1:03 pm by familoo
In F v M [2023] EWFC 5, Hayden J (building on Re A) opined that “The filter exists to protect the child and, not infrequently, the parent with whom the child lives. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 7:51 am by Michael C. Dorf
However, before taking the gloves off, as it were, I want to re-emphasize that I am truly grateful for Engel's serious engagement with our book. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 8:21 am by Russell Knight
If you want more time with your children no matter what the Guardian Ad Litem says don’t get mad…get even. [read post]