Search for: "In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. R. S. and T. A. S., Parents"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
Let’s work that back: If there is there is some evidence that suggests that any form of involvement would put the child at risk of harm then the parent is not a qualifying parent and the presumption doesn’t apply. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am
The Honorable Mark J. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am
For our purposes, people involved in Children Act proceedings are almost always going to be personally connected so we need not worry about it). [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
Deane, Dawson & Gaudron JJ held at [16]: “Paternity is a serious matter, both for the father and for the child. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
Deane, Dawson & Gaudron JJ held at [16]: “Paternity is a serious matter, both for the father and for the child. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 9:05 am
Fall & Curtis J. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
(g) Failure to protect the child from conditions within his environment injurious to the child’s welfare. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 5:26 am
(j) Open and notorious adultery or fornication. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
The Code does not typically have special rules for special areas of practice, but family violence is not strictly a family law matter. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:59 pm
It is only in rare instances that courts allow closed and anonymous proceedings, and these usually involve matter such as "abortion, birth control, and welfare prosecutions involving abandoned or illegitimate children. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
See also Mass R. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 9:12 pm
Neoliberal thinkers recoil in horror at the idea that “everyone’s taxes” might be used to provide debt relief and zero-tuition education to “the children of the privileged. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
Perhaps now is a good time to re-read in the quite different light of the second decade of the 21st century an interesting foreign observation of American political culture written in the beginning of the third decade of the 20th century--Édouard Lambert, Le Gouvernement des juges et la lutte contre la législation sociale aux États-Unis. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 12:42 am
We are the children of an invading culture. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm
J and L, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Hillingdon (2017) EWHC 3411 (Admin) This is a very interesting judicial review, concerning the interrelation of a council’s housing duties under Part 6 and Part 7 Housing Act 1996 and duties to children under s.17 Children Act 1989. [read post]
12 May 2017, 2:49 pm
’ (In re Victor L. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
’ (Welfare and Institutions Code section § 730, subd. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
(In re Antonio R. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
In Vitti, the Family Court of Dutchess County (Marlow, J.) made two findings of violation of final order of protection issued to the wife and children against the husband. [read post]
