Search for: "In the Interest of Michael H."
Results 1 - 20
of 1,709
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm
” To the same effect was language from a plurality opinion authored by Justice Antonin Scalia a decade earlier in 1989 in Michael H. v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 5:45 am
District Judge William H. [read post]
15 May 2024, 4:51 am
Readers may be interested in an analysis of the events by former Amb. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:05 pm
In 1989 in Michael H. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:00 am
Co-editor, Michael H. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:01 pm
” Following the dismissal, Akorn shareholder Theodore H. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
Nichols had some interests in common with Egilman, and had socialized with him 40 years ago. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm
Michael Dreeben rejected this argument. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 8:18 am
Dumas, and Stacy Wallace, and with Judge Michael H. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
However, following self-interest does not automatically yield socially positive results when not channeled into productive work and investments that predictably redound to collective well-being. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:50 am
Though initially raised by Justice Thomas, other justices picked up on the question, and it remains an interesting question. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 11:29 am
In a Press Release distributed 15 March 2024, the Council of Europe distributed the following statement and announcement by Secretary General Marija Pejčinović Burić on the occasion of the finalisation of the Convention's ad hoc Committee on Artificial Intelligence: “This first-of-a-kind treaty will ensure that the rise of Artificial Intelligence upholds Council of Europe legal standards in human rights, democracy and the rule of law. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
Even better, the results of requests would be available online, meaning that if someone else asked for interesting information, it would be available to everyone, potentially reducing the number of duplicate requests. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Michael A. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:06 am
My interest in this litigation arises from this implications for robust debate on matters of public concern, as I explained in this post.The post Climate Scientist Michael Mann Wins Defamation Suit Against Mark Steyn and Rand Simberg appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:48 pm
Horatia Muir Watt, for example, characterises the relationship between the two disciplines as “complementary” (H M Watt, “Private International Law”, in J M. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 12:01 am
Quayle with President George H. [read post]