Search for: "In the Interest of SJM"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2022, 6:32 am
Law360, Sept. 1, 2022 The Securities and Exchange Commission asked a Virginia federal judge on Wednesday to give it an early win in its records dispute with a watchdog group over documents that might reveal former high-ranking SEC officials' conflicts of interest associated with their oversight of cryptocurrency. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:27 pm
The post Human Rights Round-Up by SJM appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 3:51 pm
The post Listen very carefully, I shall do this only once by SJM appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:43 am
We covered the facts and the Court of Appeal decision before (in which I held myself as hostage to fortune, concluding that, as regards the further appeal, “I fear that it is a hopeless cause” – thanks to SJM and Iain Wightwick for reminding me of that). [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 5:03 pm
The post ECtHR and Social Housing-Two Recent Judgements by SJM appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:57 pm
The post On the Road Again by SJM appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 7:18 am
The post ECtHR Update by SJM appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 10:24 am
*except for Welsh tenancies The post Conscious Re-coupling and Succession by SJM appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:12 pm
The post Human Rights Round-Up Part 2 by SJM appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 3:56 pm
The 6 month time limit is also interesting. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 1:12 am
This removes temptation” (point 13) (SJM 1-10;) For those despairing for press reform, Trollope also reminds us that the republic of mediated public opinion is a great deal better than what went before. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 11:00 pm
Inforrm’s blog provides a case summary with a bit more detail, for those interested. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:04 am
One might be able to have quite an interesting play there. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:04 am
One might be able to have quite an interesting play there. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:27 am
It is difficult to disagree with that analysis - and his paper in Legal Studies on the history of social housing allocations can now be read with enhanced interest (despite the apparent downgrading of, or loss of interest in, choice-based lettings exemplified by its irrelevance to and in the draft Code). [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:27 am
It is difficult to disagree with that analysis - and his paper in Legal Studies on the history of social housing allocations can now be read with enhanced interest (despite the apparent downgrading of, or loss of interest in, choice-based lettings exemplified by its irrelevance to and in the draft Code). [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:12 am
The trial court, guided by J.N.R. concluded that it had SJM per KRS 406.011. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:37 am
April: Oregon’s SJM 12 was also unanimously approved by that state’s legislature, using much the same language as Arkansas HCR 1010 and also meets with unanimous legislative approval. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 7:17 am
The CA held that the TC made a finding that father was unfit and properly used the best interest standard in making its custody determination. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 7:04 am
And, you guessed it, the fire ignited by control issues in SJM Holdings, Ltd. is being fanned by the interests (and likely) expectations of family members. [read post]