Search for: "In the Matter of: L.L"
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2022, 9:18 am
[1] See Lewis County Family Court’s Order dated July 15, 2021, following the adjudication hearing in this matter [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm
ReferencesAlban, L., Poulsen, M.K., Petersen, J.V., Lindegaard, L.L., Meinert, L., Koch, A.G. and Møgelmose, V., 2022. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 5:40 pm
Scheduling Divisional Court Matters … 4. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:34 am
., L.L. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 10:29 am
There is much more to protecting you in criminal matters than just making a trial presentation before a jury in a DUI case. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 9:00 am
At trial, and again over L.L. [read post]
3 May 2017, 12:32 pm
Ct. 2064 (2013); Dominium Austin Partners, L.L. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 9:21 am
Supp. 3d at 435–38; see also L.L. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:03 am
L.L. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:28 pm
Skippy Inc., 214 F.3d 456, 462-463 (4th Cir. 2000); L.L. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm
L.L. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 12:40 pm
Blatt testified that Tinkerbell loves to fetch and chase balls, and the only witness to the incident who testified, N.B., stated that L.L. took the ball from the dog, that L.L. held the ball as if to throw it, and that the dog “accidently” bit L.L. in an attempt to get the ball. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 5:55 am
When she didn’t response, L.L. stated correctly that she was the student with the head lice. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 4:42 pm
All matters not decided herein are hereby denied. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 6:31 am
Spring Break ’83 Productions, L.L .C., 688 F.3d 247, 253–256 & n. 10 (5th Cir.2012). [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 10:01 pm
" In L.L. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 9:59 am
Simmons, The Los Angeles Times More Blog Entries: L.L. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:27 am
I use Time Matters. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 10:05 pm
I use Time Matters. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 5:21 am
” Furthermore, a stipulation consenting to a reference to a specified referee, executed by the parties in connection with the father's previous petition to modify the visitation schedule, expired upon completion of that matter and did not remain in effect for this matter. [read post]
