Search for: "In the Matter of Mark C. Bonn"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
Union Jack and European Union flag 2012 © Dave Kellam (CC BY-SA 2.0 Deed) Today marks a significant step towards the reconstruction of EU-UK Judicial Cooperation. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 5:48 am
As Mr Layton effectively illustrated, the CJEU’s jurisprudence in this field is characterized by two periods marking different interpretative patterns: while, until 2017, the CJEU tended to interpret the concept of contractual matters restrictively, holding that “all actions which seek to establish the liability of a defendant and which are not related to a contract” fall within the concept of tort (C-189/87, Kalfelis), the Court interpretation… [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 6:20 am
Karp, and Richard C. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 5:12 am
Interestingly enough, the argument that ” refusal of registration only means that the sign is not granted protection under trade mark law and does not prevent the use of the sign – even in commercial matters” echoes arguments which were made to justify the USPTO’s refusal to “THE SLANTS”. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:31 am
The CJEU addressed the issue in 2011 in Red Bull v Frisdranken (C-119/10), however, the contract manufacturer in that case did not affix the infringing sign to the goods. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 5:07 am
As for the first point, EUIPO argued that the aesthetic value of a trade mark is, as a matter of principle, irrelevant. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 12:37 am
Skykick (C-371/18) – see the earlier blog here. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:23 am
Rather, the question of the clarity and precision of a term is an ex officio matter, to be examined by the relevant Trade Mark Office when considering an application. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 4:15 am
A verbal description of the sign must clarify the subject matter and scope of the protection and cannot be inconsistent with the graphic representation or give rise to doubt. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 2:26 am
C. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 5:00 am
This culinary, ethnological and mathematical introduction is meant to underline the significance of the matter C-237/19, recently referred to the European Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling by the Supreme Court of Hungary (in Hungarian: Kúria) and concerning the following 3D mark[1]: Gömböc Kft. applied for a Hungarian national trademark for the shape of the Gömböc for class 14 “decorative objects”, class 21… [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 1:22 am
Referring to the CJEU case law (C-254/09 Calvin Klein Trademark or joint cases: C-581/13 and C-582/13 Ballon d’or), the link between disputable signs at stake must be sufficient in consumers’ minds. [read post]
14 May 2019, 12:45 am
Is the difference really a matter of the amount of evidence proffered to prove “artistic” value or is there something else? [read post]
8 May 2019, 12:21 am
With respect to passing off, the plaintiff must establish: (a) reputation of the goods; (b) possibility of deception of the consumer; and (c) likelihood of loss. [read post]
7 May 2019, 3:56 am
Clearly the Polish Constitutional Tribunal took IP matters on the radar. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 6:15 am
In this matter the applicant had also submitted a large amount of proof that the mark had acquired distinctiveness through use which the BOA however did not find convincing. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 12:37 am
That said, as the new Article 7(1)(e)(iii) was (and is) immediately applicable to all trademark applications pending at March 23, 2016 (and the same should apply to national marks pending at the various dates of entry to force of the national laws implementing the Recast Directive No. 2015/2436), it is extremely puzzling and somewhat incomprehensible why certain kind of trademarks which were granted registrations immediately before March 23, 2016 are valid as a matter of law, while… [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm
The matter is part heard On 25 to 28 March 2019 Julian Knowles J heard the trial in the defamation case of Bull v Desporte. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 8:44 pm
Sara Parrello and Fabio AngeliniIs being environmentally friendly a quality which matters for consumers? [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 10:50 pm
Norway: Ridicule as a response to claims of trade mark infringement A trade mark infringement matter which has been making the headlines in Norway the last week concerns the small Norwegian beverage producer O. [read post]
