Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: F. M. I., Child." Results 1 - 20 of 59
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2023, 1:03 pm by Russell Knight
Section 508 just refers back to Section 501…so Im not even sure why Section 506 refers to Section 508. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am by Joel R. Brandes
It remitted the matter to the Family Court for a new hearing and determination. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 10:29 am by familoo
The Ward ‘compelling reasons’ was ported into the 2014 guidance published by Sir James Munby relating to the publication of judgments:   ‘Where a judgment relates to matters set out in Schedule 1 or 2 below and a written judgment already exists in a publishable form or the judge has already ordered that the judgment be transcribed, the starting point is that permission should be given for the judgment to be published unless there are compelling reasons why the… [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 1:03 pm by familoo
So Im seizing the moment. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
  It is therefore important to adopt measures to protect the general welfare and the interest of the collectivity as a whole under the concept of public order (ordre public). [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Jack Goldsmith
[Jack Goldsmith and I will have an article out about the Dormant Commerce Clause, geolocation, and state regulations of Internet transactions in the Texas Law Review early next year, and I'm serializing it here. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 5:00 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
The child welfare and juvenile justice systems are both plagued by systemic and structural racism. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am by familoo
As far as Im aware it is only defined in statute in one place – s76 of the Serious Crime Act 2015, which made CCB a criminal offence. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am by Russell Knight
Im not sure why they think a signature is all it takes to terminate a parent-child relationship…because that’s definitely not how it works in Illinois. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm by Marty Lederman
  So as not to make this post overly long, I'll assume familiarity with my post from yesterday, where I discuss some of these matters in greater detail.Is Philadelphia's Nondiscrimination Condition Generally Applicable? [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:01 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
And, “[i]f a district court’s ruling on a 60(b) motion is based on clearly erroneous factual findings or flawed legal conclusions, the district court has likely abused its discretion. [read post]