Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: M. M. B., Child."
Results 1 - 20
of 134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2009, 9:57 am
Our answer is that it matters, but not in terms of her welfare. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 3:51 am
M also has a young child with F3 who is referred to as F. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:00 pm
§ 1915(a)-(b). [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 6:14 pm
§ 63-17-20(B) (Unless the court orders otherwise, the custody of an illegitimate child is solely in the natural mother unless the mother has relinquished her rights to the child). [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act) In the Matter of B. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
(b) Failure to maintain a reasonable degree of interest, concern or responsibility as to the child’s welfare. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 10:02 am
A Systematic Literature Review of the Gap between a Right to Participate and Participation, in Welfare Services Policy and Practice NoteJulie A Tippens, Amleset Tewodros, Helen M Miamidian, Kara Kohel, & Alex Otieno, Church as NGO? [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:40 pm
It was said to b a compilation of the details of “29 children in 13 families who were killed…as a result of contact (and in one case residence) arrangements”. [read post]
6 Aug 2016, 1:37 pm
I must, as a matter of law and as set out above, weigh public policy concerns against the welfare of these particular children. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 7:22 am
Div. 1997) (citing In re Baby M, 109 N.J. at 426). [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
As it is a question of fact, ultimately this must be a matter for the court. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
As it is a question of fact, ultimately this must be a matter for the court. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:28 pm
I/M/O W.R. and L.R. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 8:49 am
I'm not going to give you advice about bailing your "fiance" out of jail in Moosylvania, no matter how sad the story. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 11:18 pm
Federal Magistrate Coker's decision was to reject the mother's application to return to Sydney with the child. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:16 am
However, a decision under Part VII on whether the child can reasonably be expected to reside with the parent is not made on the assumption that the parent will have accommodation available, but instead involves deciding whether such accommodation should be secured, which brings in wider considerations than the welfare of the child. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:19 pm
(B) Mother. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:24 pm
Other than matters relating to the mother, her physical health, her mental health and/or personality, there has been no valid reason to limit or curtail the relationship between M and her father, yet the court process has concluded, after more than ten years, with an order denying the father any direct contact with his daughter. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 9:08 am
It's late and, frankly, I still can't be bothered to trawl through the Welfare Reform Act 2009, but from what I can gather a) the Telegraph incorrectly report a potential sentence of 7 years for perjury as 7 days and b) the original article I linked to wrongly reports that the WRA 09 would give a power to prosecute Fathers for non-registration of births, when (unless I'm missing something) the WRA 09 in fact only provides that a breach of the sole… [read post]