Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: V. S. V." Results 1 - 20 of 2,438
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
And nothing about it impinges upon the paramountcy principle – welfare trumps all. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 10:13 am by Chukwuma Okoli
This paper demystifies India’s conflict of law rules on the law governing disputes on letters of credit by examining relevant judicial trends. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 1:31 am by Keith Mallinson
It’s notable from recent FRAND decisions in the UK (i.e. in Interdigital v. [read post]
25 May 2024, 11:12 pm by Frank Cranmer
: Animal Welfare Beats Freedom of Religion: yet another critical comment on the ECtHR’s judgment in Executief van de Moslims van België et al. v Belgium. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:17 am by INFORRM
Clause 6(iii) makes clear that “children under 16 must not be…photographed on issues involving their own or another child’s welfare unless a custodial parent or similarly responsible adult consents”. [read post]
8 May 2024, 12:51 pm by Duana Boswell-Loechel
Failing to comply with court orders related to the child’s welfare, such as attending counseling or completing a treatment program. [read post]
7 May 2024, 12:03 pm by Brian Galbraith
Recent cases illustrate how courts approach pet custody matters: In Schindle v Schindle, the Court of Queen’s Bench ruled that while pets are treated as property, making custody rulings in a property matter is inappropriate. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:53 am by JURIST Staff
Her activism commenced at the age of eighteen, when she challenged her father’s unjust imprisonment under martial law regulations in the landmark case “Miss Asma Jilani v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:05 am by Laura
For example, thedecision of the House of Lords in White v White [2001] 1 AC 596was adopted by the Court of Final Appeal of Hong Kong in LKW v DD [2010] HKFLR 016, enshrining the principle of ‘equal sharing’ of matrimonial assets in a shift from previous needs-based approach per C v C which had historically simply provided wives on divorce with enough to meet their reasonable requirements. [read post]