Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B. B. and W. S., Parents." Results 1 - 20 of 51
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2023, 10:50 am by Giles Peaker
A s.204 appeal was dismissed and Ms W-H appealed to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am by Joel R. Brandes
It remitted the matter to the Family Court for a new hearing and determination. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:13 am by Kate Fort
This case presents the following issue: What constitutes reversible error when a child welfare agency fails to make the statutorily required inquiry concerning a childs potential Indian ancestry? [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am by familoo
In Appleton, Mostyn conceded he might have gone a bit far there, and of course the Re S balancing exercise would still need to be carried out (see Re S (A Child) [2004] UKHL 47, which sets out the exercise judges must carry out to decide issues that engage competing convention rights, under Article 8 private and family life and Article 10 freedom of expression). [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 7:00 am by Russell Knight
How do these child custody concepts; parenting time and parental decision-making get decided in an Illinois divorce or parentage matter? [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm by familoo
The fact of the findings and the nature of the findings b. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 5:16 am by David Bernstein
As a resource for teachers, parents, and students I am going to list the errors and egregious misinterpretations of history I found in the last 1/3 of the book. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:15 am by Eugene Volokh
" We clarified that the "state's compelling interest to protect a child in any given case, however, is not triggered unless a court finds that a parent's speech is causing or will cause harm to a child's welfare. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:39 pm by Marty Lederman
Code 55-3700.61 (“The Department delegates its authority under Article IX of the Public Welfare Code (62 P.S. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
” “[A]s a general matter, the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
The new rules do not apply to disclosures regarding health and welfare benefit plans, which the DOL believes to be a more challenging matter that requires further study. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
The 2016 Guidelines provide, among other things, that Aif a proceeding seeks to terminate the parental rights of one parent, that proceeding falls within ICWA=s definition of >child‑custody proceeding= even if the child will remain in the custody of the other parent or a step‑parent@ (2016 Guidelines [B][2] ). [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 5:33 am by Michael Busby
         the right to confer with the other parent to the extent possible before making a decision concerning the health, education, and welfare of the child;   3. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:33 am by Lee E. Berlik
Flint Hill School was (and remains) a dispute between a Fairfax County school and the parent of a minor child who attends the school. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
And when a doctor describes to expectant parents that it will be expensive and emotionally burdensome if they choose to have a child that genetic tests show may have a disability. [read post]