Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S. L. L. and J. R. N., Parents"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
Article 8, no contact as an interference in the child’s right to family life with her other parent). [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]
9 May 2007, 8:06 am
As before, custody matters are not to be decided by a jury. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:28 am
Parent’s Incarceration Not an Automatic Reason for Blocking Visitation In Matter of Granger v Miscercola, --- N.E.2d ----, 2013 WL 1798581 (N. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
The husband’s affidavit and R.L. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:36 pm
Lisa R., it found that a stipulation signed by the birth mother conferred a legal right to her lesbian partner to exercise the role of parent. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am
And that’s what this post is about. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
See also Mass R. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 12:54 am
.
A2190
Bacalles -- Requires non-indigent prisoners to bear the cost of medical care provided by the county or city of New York to such non-indigent prisoners while in prisonSUMM : Amd SS500-h, 500-n & 508, Cor L Requires non-indigent prisoners to bear the cost of medical care provided to them by the county or city of New York while such non-indigent prisoners are in prison. 01/16/07 referred to correction
LAW / CORRECTNSA2228
Lafayette (MS) --… [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:59 pm
It is only in rare instances that courts allow closed and anonymous proceedings, and these usually involve matter such as "abortion, birth control, and welfare prosecutions involving abandoned or illegitimate children. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
In Vitti, the Family Court of Dutchess County (Marlow, J.) made two findings of violation of final order of protection issued to the wife and children against the husband. [read post]