Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: D. R. L., Parent"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2023, 1:11 pm
Jones and D. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 1:33 pm
Aziza Ahmed Professor of Law and R. [read post]
Yale Journal of Law & Feminism Symposium – Meeting the Moment: Legal Frameworks for Feminist Futures
14 Mar 2023, 1:23 pm
Aziza Ahmed Professor of Law and R. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am
The Court “assume[d] without deciding that the first factor would weigh in Vaz’s favor. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am
I think there are a range of respectable views about the issues I canvass here, but this is my take and I’d be interested in other people’s thoughts upon it. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
” 750 ILCS 50/1(D)(h) A parent can sign away their rights to a child via an adoption in Illinois. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 5:26 am
(d) Substantial neglect of the child if continuous or repeated. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
’s overnight stays at the marital homes and on vacation were always in a babysitter capacity with the children present, that R.L. slept in a room at the marital home assigned to her by the wife, and that R.L. always attended any social events in a babysitter capacity with the wife and children present. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:59 pm
It is only in rare instances that courts allow closed and anonymous proceedings, and these usually involve matter such as "abortion, birth control, and welfare prosecutions involving abandoned or illegitimate children. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:01 am
Corp., 67 F.3d 296, *4, 23 Media L. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 8:26 am
“[T]he language of [section] 1914 itself ... limits standing to challenge state-law terminations of parental right to parents ‘from whose custody such child was removed’ ” (Matter of Adoption of Child of Indian Heritage, 111 N.J. 155, 179, 543 A.2d 925, 937, quoting 25 USC § 1914; see Matter of S.C., 1992 OK 98, ¶ 23, 833 P.2d 1249, 1254, overruled on other grounds Matter of Baby Boy L., 2004 OK 93, 103 P.3d… [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
L’expérience américaine du contrôle judiciaire de la constitutionnalité des lois (Paris, Marcel Giard & Cie., 1921. 276 pp.). [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
At times, a court must delicately balance the best interests of the children and their parents with contract rights, religious matters, ethical and social values, and constitutional principles and individual rights. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
At times, a court must delicately balance the best interests of the children and their parents with contract rights, religious matters, ethical and social values, and constitutional principles and individual rights. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
In his motion respondent relies on recent appellate authority, to wit Matter of Vitti, 202 A.D.2d 917, 609 N.Y.S.2d 686 (3rd Dept.1994) which holds that Family Court Act Article 8 does not authorize imposition of consecutive commitments. [read post]
11 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Must law defer to science in matters of parentage? [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:54 am
Div., 1987), rv’d on other grounds, sub.nom., Matter of Baby M, 109 N.J. 396 (1988). [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 10:10 pm
Five Things to Know About the Florida Medical Marijuana Act of 2015 Florida Medical Marijuana Complete Text of Proposed 2015 LawThe new law proposed in Florida may be known as “The Florida Medical Marijuana Act. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
The legal complications surrounding Baby Veronica’s custody arose from an apparent conflict between the federal Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), a 1978 law designed to reduce improper removals of Indian children from their parents and their placement with non-Indian families, and South Carolina’s rules regarding the rights of unwed fathers. [read post]
