Search for: "Incorrectly Filed v. Incorrectly Filed"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,431
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
[Eugene Volokh] My Identifying Would-Be Jane Doe Litigant in Law Review Article Wasn't "Harassment,"
30 May 2024, 12:55 pm
From Luo v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 3:01 am
Fisher v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 2:45 am
It cited the Munich Local Division’s decision in SES v Hanshow that the wording of the application as filed could be used to interpret the granted claims, but noted that this was irrelevant in 10x Genomics v Curio and therefore required no decision. [read post]
19 May 2024, 8:06 am
In Mashaud v. [read post]
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm
The basis for this decision is explained in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
[*2]The City actors are the Mayor of the City of New York, the New York City Department of Education, and its Chancellor (collectively the City).Plaintiffs challenge State and City policies that plaintiffs claim deny Black and Latinx [FN3] students their state constitutional right to a "sound basic education" under article XI § 1 (Board of Educ., Levittown Union Free School Dist. v Nyquist, 57 NY2d 27, 48 [1982], appeal dismissed 459 US 1138, 1139… [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
[*2]The City actors are the Mayor of the City of New York, the New York City Department of Education, and its Chancellor (collectively the City).Plaintiffs challenge State and City policies that plaintiffs claim deny Black and Latinx [FN3] students their state constitutional right to a "sound basic education" under article XI § 1 (Board of Educ., Levittown Union Free School Dist. v Nyquist, 57 NY2d 27, 48 [1982], appeal dismissed 459 US 1138, 1139… [read post]
1 May 2024, 12:08 pm
LLC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
Several of his attempts to relate the history of dust diseases were little more than recycled litigation reports, previously filed in various cases, with footnotes added. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 1:14 am
In the third (and final) of our blogs reporting on the UK Court of Appeal decision in Lidl v Tesco, we examine the findings in relation to non-use revocation. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
# # #DECISIONM.A.M. v Palisades Ctr. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Custodia filed an application for a master account in October 2020 with the FRBKC. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am
Under the Laken Riley Act, therefore, an applicant for adjustment of status who travels on advance parole, and is later incorrectly charged with or arrested for theft or shoplifting, would need to be detained by immigration authorities until the completion of those removal proceedings. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 7:11 am
Robinson v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 1:30 pm
” (See Ray v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:58 am
Court of Justice of the EU, Bundesverband Souvenir - Geschenke - Ehrenpreise v EUIPO, C-488/16 P, at para. 38). [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
Trump v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
From last week's California Court of Appeal decision in Cusi v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
In Sjunde AP-Fonden v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:02 am
Photo: momo Indication of product v descriptionIn respect of the second issue, this arose because the UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) had explained that, in April 2023, it had become aware that "indication of product" information provided by applicants was incorrectly showing in the "description" section, and this issue applied to the words "Light Up Gin Bottle" which had previously appeared as a description for the Registered… [read post]
