Search for: "Inquiry Concerning A Judge"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,913
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:45 am
Big picture: A Quebec judge is concerned about the same language rights for different reasons. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am
My hope here is to trigger more inquiries or prompt additional discussion from Pozen. [read post]
3 May 2024, 10:48 am
But … we are unconvinced that the prohibitions … at issue here sufficiently serve that purpose to sustain its validity insofar as the public sidewalks on the perimeter of the grounds are concerned. [read post]
2 May 2024, 3:05 am
The concern: Military judges are still part of the military. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am
Pozen characterizes all the arguments he explores as “credible at the time they were brought, as evidenced by the support they received from lower court judges and legal scholars” that he painstakingly documents. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:41 am
Is the investigation a bipartisan inquiry? [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am
Making or directing others to make public statements about known or reasonably foreseeable witnesses concerning their potential participation in the investigation or in this criminal proceeding; b. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:15 am
I don't know the answer to these questions, but I think they would likely have to be resolved subsequent to any standing inquiry. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Freed often responded to comments with his own reply postings, including replies to residents who had posed their own inquiries concerning community matters. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 9:35 pm
" In other words, the concern behind the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause was about progress. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:00 am
Relying on the Martin case, a three-judge 9th Circuit panel upheld that ruling; the full court of appeals denied the city’s request to rehear the case by a vote of 14-13. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am
Judge Radkoff moved the trial from January 29, 2024, to March 25, 2024, to accommodate Do Kwon’s extradition proceedings in Montenegro. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
Rivera’s attorney told a three-judge panel that a federal judge ignored conflicting evidence in siding with the FEC and ordering Rivera to pay a $456,000 fine for violating the Federal Election Campaign Act. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:59 am
Court of Appeals, in an opinion by Judge April Wood, joined by Judges Donna Stroud and Jefferson Griffin: Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court's order granting summary judgment for Defendant and dismissing all their claims arising out of Defendant's Executive Order No. 141 issued in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:55 am
Secretary of State for Business and Trade concerned the nature of the assessment to be conducted by the SST under each of these criteria and the required threshold of knowledge. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
” A federal district judge dismissed the charge under Section 1512(c)(2). [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:17 am
The case concerns 18 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 5:35 am
The NAR asserts that it made concessions in policy to resolve concerns from the DOJ. [read post]
