Search for: "Institute for Wildlife Protection v. US Fish and Wildlife"
Results 1 - 20
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service issued a notice that the agency will begin a five-year review of five northeastern species under the Endangered Species Act. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service decision would increase administrative costs. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service issued a rule removing 21 species from the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife due to probable extinction. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:24 am
Make UC a Good Neighbor v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm
This left “more than one million acres of wetlands unmapped and without protection. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
Davis discussed the end of U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
Davis discussed the end of U.S. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am
Rally, inter alia, participated in several calls and email exchanges with officials from NMFS, the Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”), and the Marine Mammal Commission (“MMC”) regarding the issue. [read post]
4 May 2022, 10:27 am
For example, a tribe might seek to contract with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to operate a wildlife refuge, with the National Park Service to manage a park or monument, or even with the Bureau of Reclamation to operate a federal dam. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 6:47 am
Fish & Wildlife Serv. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 2:11 pm
Our interns, Mitchell Beebe, Elena Botts, Kayla DeAlto, Austin Max Scherer, Teddy David, Jamie Jang, Kenneth Boggess, and Julia V. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 2:11 pm
Our interns, Mitchell Beebe, Elena Botts, Kayla DeAlto, Austin Max Scherer, Teddy David, Jamie Jang, Kenneth Boggess, and Julia V. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service proposed listing a Nevada desert flower, known as Tiehm’s buckwheat, under the Endangered Species Act. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Its position is based in the claim that the ongoing operation of the pipeline violates the “public trust doctrine” and that there is a common law obligation on the state to protect waters such as the Great Lakes in favour of the public interest for navigation, hunting, and fishing.[4] At this point, the May 12 deadline has passed as both sides are participating in court-ordered mediation. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 12:30 pm
In 2011, the Fish and Wildlife Service lists the Pacific walrus as endangered or threatened. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm
Gantner v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 6:18 am
Fish and Wildlife Services v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 7:24 am
Hyatt ; Janus v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service—are tasked with preserving each monument in its original condition. [read post]
