Search for: "Interest of B.V."
Results 1 - 20
of 181
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2024, 1:15 am
On 24 April 2024, the UPC’s Central Division in Paris granted Nicoventures Trading Limited access to written pleadings and evidence under RoP 262.1(b) in a patent revocation case brought by NJOY Netherlands B.V. against Juul Labs International, Inc (ORD_587436/2023 in UPC_CFI_316/2023). [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:43 am
See, In re Marco Guldenaar Holding B.V., 911 F.3d 1157, 1165 (Fed. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:25 pm
Two of the defendants (Google Netherlands B.V. and Google Netherlands Holdings B.V.) against whom the claim was filed are established in the Netherlands, and for them the standard rule of Article 4 Brussels I-bis Regulation applies. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:57 pm
B.V. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 8:27 am
It is only to the extent that 17 other selves, even those created by humanity, relate to humans, that they become 18 of interest—and most be regulated, possessed, controlled, and managed—with 19 respect to its interaction with or use by humans. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
The group would likely be caught (i) once by EU CSRD rules, at the level of Sony Europe B.V. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Fokker Services B.V., 818 F.3d 733 (D.C. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 12:30 am
Such an opaque exception that relies on one’s interpretation of public interest could be used in varying ways and levels of intensity, depending on the interests of the authority relying on it. [read post]
18 May 2023, 5:16 am
Treasury moved decisively against Putin’s business interests and sanctioned six key oligarchs (including Putin’s son-in-law) and 12 companies they owned or controlled. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 12:15 am
It will be also interesting to see to what extent multimedia trade marks will be successfully enforced through traditional litigation procedures. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 7:58 am
Mercis B.V. has been managing and protecting the cartoonist's interests since 1971, as well exploiting relevant rights. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 8:47 am
The guidelines were laid down in the judgment delivered by Justice B.V. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 8:54 am
” In a dissenting opinion, Justice B.V. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 10:57 pm
The EC proposal only refers to the (indeed) important condition in the case law of the ECtHR of an “overriding requirement in the public interest”, but it does not further clarify the other, including procedural requirements developed in the case law of the ECtHR on protection of journalistic sources such as in its Grand Chamber judgments in Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands and Big Brother Watch a.o. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 4:22 am
And to comply with EU law, any interference with free expression must meet four conditions: (a) be “provided by law”, (b) respect the “essence” of freedom of expression, (c) meet an “objective of general interest”, and (d) be proportionate. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 11:16 pm
Sorry, but if a judge thinks an entity named Apple Benelux B.V. doesn't necessarily do business in Belgium (the "Be" in "Benelux") and the Netherlands (the "ne" in "Benelux"), despite Ericsson (according to the decision) having pointed to indications that went beyond the name, one is left to wonder what's going on there. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 6:05 am
As the Supreme Court noted in Verlinden B.V. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 10:01 pm
" The defendants are Apple Retail Germany B.V. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 10:17 am
, 480 U.S. 102 (1987); Glencore Grain Rotterdam B.V. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 1:14 am
Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. [read post]
