Search for: "International Transport, Inc. v. U. S"
Results 1 - 20
of 56
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
While some companies have made the argument successfully that they had no knowledge of a partner’s intentions to transport their goods to New York (Ortiz v Food Mach. of Am., Inc.) (2014 NY Slip Op. 31868[U] [Bronx Ct. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 9:39 am
In 2021, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals confirmed that the federal rules supersede California’s overtime laws for interstate truck drivers (International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 2785 v. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
Paul, 505 U. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
[FN1] It is well settled that, "[u]nder FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection" (Matter of Empire Ch. of Associated Bldrs. and Contractors, Inc. v New York State Dept. of Transportation, ___ AD3d ___, ___, 2022 NY Slip Op 06852, *1 [3d Dept 2022] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
[FN1] It is well settled that, "[u]nder FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection" (Matter of Empire Ch. of Associated Bldrs. and Contractors, Inc. v New York State Dept. of Transportation, ___ AD3d ___, ___, 2022 NY Slip Op 06852, *1 [3d Dept 2022] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:51 am
” Referring to the now-defunct Interstate Commerce Commission and Civil Aeronautics Board, she noted “the disastrous regulatory frameworks in the transportation industry teach the attentive student that rules stifle innovation, increase costs, raise prices, limit choice, and decrease output, frequently harming the very parties they are intended to benefit, and the benefits that flowed to consumers when competition replaced regulation in transportation. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 12:34 pm
See Department of Transportation v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
The FDA’s M7 Guidance observes that “[s]tandard risk assessments of known carcinogens assume that cancer risk increases as a function of cumulative dose. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
International Refugee Assistance Project, 582 U. [read post]
11 May 2021, 9:47 am
Lyft, Inc., No. 1:20-cv-01426 (D.D.C. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 10:48 am
Fox Television Stations, Inc., 556 U. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Department of Transportation (2020) 46 Cal.App.5th 1103. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am
Indeed, it has been held that one may assume a duty, which initially did not exist, and may be held liable where his or her affirmative action adversely affected that plaintiff and he or she failed to act reasonably (see Arroyo v We Transport, Inc., 118 AD3d 648, 649 [2d Dept 2014]; Gordon v Muchnik, 180 AD2d 715 [2d Dept 1992]). [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
Phrase at (one's) discretion attested from 1570s (earlier in (one's) discretion, late 14c.), from sense of "power to decide or judge, power of acting according to one's own judgment" (late 14c.). [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:22 am
The allegations must be pied with particularity (see Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP (US), 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015], Iv denied 28 NY3d 903 [2016]). [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:22 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus NEW PRIME INC. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Eisman of counsel), amicus curiae pro se.Morningside Heights Legal Services, Inc., New York, NY (Elora Mukherjee, National Immigrant Justice Center [Mark Fleming and Katherine Melloy Goettel], pro se, and Christopher N. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:55 pm
Supreme Court’s May, 2015 decision in Tibble v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 6:28 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals,Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [read post]
