Search for: "J. D. Martin" Results 1 - 20 of 1,116
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The appeal must be dismissed.Respondent has, through board policy, “delegate[d] its authority to designate library materials to be used in the [d]istrict to the school library media specialist(s). [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The appeal must be dismissed.Respondent has, through board policy, “delegate[d] its authority to designate library materials to be used in the [d]istrict to the school library media specialist(s). [read post]
3 May 2024, 2:58 am by Paul Maharg
It was billed in the conference programme as the launch of the BILETA online teaching policy. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
There was a good bit of irony in Egilman’s reaching out to me to help him prepare for my deposition of him in a silicone gel breast implant case. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
Martin Wells set out to do a meta-analysis, which was all fine and good. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am by CFM Admin
April 19, 2024 Clients, Friends, and Associates: As we end the first quarter and enter the spring season, we would like to highlight some of the recent industry updates and occurrences we found to be both interesting and impactful. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
 Pix Credit hereIn a quite interesting case, the European Court of Human Rights issued its opinion and judgment in  Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
   David Boyd, UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights and the Environment has recently summarized and reflected on th quite interesting case recently decided by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in Habitantes de La Oroya Vs. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by admin
Feb. 24, 2010) (quoting from Rule 26 report of Martin T. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]