Search for: "J. DOES, 1-99" Results 1 - 20 of 613
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
As neither House of Parliament has raised an objection by 17 May 2024,[1] the way seems to be paved for the Government’s ambitious plans to have the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention[2] implemented and ratified by the end of June 2024.[3] For the first time since the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union (so-called Brexit) on 31 January 2020, a general multilateral instrument would thus once again be put in place to govern the mutual recognition and enforcement of… [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Chan, J.) entered on or about April 8, 2022, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied the motion of defendant 316 Bowery Realty Corp. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:44 pm by Patricia Hughes
In the appeal from the tribunal’s first decision, Poelman J. also indicated Dr. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm by Guest Author
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,[1] recently argued in the Supreme Court, mainly concerns the limitations period for judicial review of agency decisions. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:07 am by admin
An IARC IIA classification could thus represent a posterior probability of 1% in favor of carcinogenicity (and 99% probable not a carcinogen). [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:48 pm by Joseph L. Hyde
App. 506, 512, 500 S.E.2d 112, 116 (1998) (Greene, J., concurring in result, joined by Timmons-Goodson, J.). [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
”[1]   Kristen Ranges recently earned her law degree from the University of Miami School of Law, and her doctorate in Environmental Science and Policy, from the University of Miami Rosenstiel School of Marine, Atmospheric, and Earth Science. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:16 pm by Jeanne Huang
Carnival’s expressio unius-style argument that s 5(1)(g) does not support the passengers’ case because the unfair contracts prohibition is not predicated on ‘engaging in’ any conduct, wher [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Does the EPC confer jurisdiction on the EPO to determine whether a party validly claims to be a successor in title as referred to in Article 87(1)(b) EPC? [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:55 am by Elizabeth Goitein
Notably, FISA does not require the full slate of protections that the Fourth Amendment demands in non-foreign intelligence cases, nor does it impose the more robust restrictions and obligations contained in the Wiretap Act. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 6:44 pm by Franklin C. McRoberts
Thus, res judicata does not bar this action without a valid and final judgment on the merits in a prior action. [read post]