Search for: "J. Odell" Results 1 - 20 of 45
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
In Dyson v Channel Four Television Corporation [2022] EWHC 2718 (KB) (31 October 2022) at first instance, Nicklin J said: 18. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
Kinlen J held (at [60]) that the leak amounted to a breach of a duty of care in negligence and to misfeasance of public office. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
Saini J adopted Longstaff J’s reasoning, and held that those who had misused the claimant’s personal data were the criminal third-party hackers, and not the defendant which had been hacked ([2021] EWHC 2168 [31]). [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
Baker J said that O’Flaherty J in the Supreme Court in Heaney (above) dealt with the right to silence as a corollary of freedom of expression “by reference to Article 40.3.1”, whereas he in fact dealt with it by reference to Article 40.6. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Recent cases citing these rights together include Watson v Campos [2016] IEHC 18 (14 January 2016) [28] (Barrett J); Rooney v Shell E&P Ireland [2017] IEHC 63 (20 January 2017) [31]-[32] (Ní Raifeartaigh J); Ryanair v Channel 4 Television [2017] IEHC 651 (05 October 2017) [49]-[52] (Meenan J). [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 6:29 am
Fried (Harvard Law School) and Ehud Kamar (Tel Aviv University), on Tuesday, August 11, 2020 Tags: Alibaba, Boards of Directors, Capital structure, China, Controlling shareholders, International governance, Minority shareholders Shareholder Complaints Seek to Hold Directors Liable for Lack of Diversity Posted by Francesca Odell, Victor Hou, and James Langston, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Tuesday, August 11, 2020 … [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:36 am by INFORRM
The General Data Protection Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 [the GDPR]) provides both for public enforcement by data protection authorities and for private enforcement by any person who has suffered damage as a result of an infringement of the Regulation (on this inter-connection, see Johanna Chamberlain & Jane Reichel “The Relationship Between Damages and Administrative Fines in the EU General Data Protection… [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
As to that “content rating and age-gating”, Head 51 provides as follows (on p85 of the pdf of the Heads of the Bill): Head 51 – Online safety guidance materials (1) The Media Commission may issue guidance materials in matters relevant to harmful online content and inappropriate online content.(2) relevant and designated online services shall have regard to these guidance materials in their operations as appropriate.(3) in preparing guidance materials the Media Commission shall have… [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
His claims failed before MacMenamin J in the High Court and Baker J (Clarke CJ and Dunne J concurring) in the Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
And, in Murphy v Callinan [2018] IESC 59 (30 November 2018) [36]-[44], Baker J (Clarke CJ and Dunne J concurring) in the Supreme Court approved Feeney J’s analysis in Collins (I will return to this case in a future post). [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 2:52 am by INFORRM
The second case was Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2011] 1 WLR 1985, [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) (16 June 2010) … Tugendhat J held that in addition to the procedural threshold recognised in Jameel, there was a substantive threshold of seriousness to be surmounted before a statement could be regarded as meeting the legal definition of “defamatory”. [read post]